Asmita Agarwal Vs. the Enforcement Directorate and ors.

Decided On : Nov-22-2001

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 107, Article 21, the Customs Act, the Constitution Bench, the Customs Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 160 Cr, Section 40, Section 160, Section 160 Cr, Section 160, Section 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 160, Section 40, Section 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Indian Penal Code, Section 4, Section 4(2, Section 4(2, Section 4, Section 5, Section 4(2, Section 4(2, Section 2 of the Code, Section 160 Cr, Section 160 and Section 167 of the Code, Chapter i.e. Chapter XII, Section 167, Chapter XII, Section 160

PERSON: Usha Mehra, K.K. Sud, Arun Kumar Bajorja, Anil Sharma, K.K. Sud, Chandra Mehta, Sud, M. Samba Siva Rao, Y.P. Narula, Anr, Abhishek Verma, Abhishek Verma, inter se, P.C., Y.P. Narula, Anil Sharma, Anr, M. Samba Siva Rao, K.K. Sud, K.K. Sud, Addl, Anr

DATE: 1973, 1962, 1983, 1427, 1962, JT 1996, 1st December, 1992, 5th May, 1996, 8th May, 1997, March, 1997, 14th May, 1997, 8th May, 1997, the age of fifteen years, 8th May, 1997

ORG: Criminal Procedure, Supreme Court, Dukhishyam, High Court, Agency, The Apex Court, Apex Court, State, CBI, the Apex Court, Apex Court, Apex Court, Illias v. Collector of Customs, SC, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, CBI, the Apex Court, Foreign Exchange, Sections 4 & 5 of Code of Criminal Procedure, DSPE, the Directorate of Enforcement, the Central Government, Enforcement Directorate & Anr, Supreme Court, Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan, Bar, Parliament, Court, Admittedly Supreme Court, Dukhishyam Benupani, Poolpandi, CBI, Enforcement Directorate, the Apex Court, the High Court, the High Court, Apex Court, High Court, Criminal Procedure, the Supreme Court, Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan, Apex Court, Apex Court, the applicability of Section 167 of the Code, Apex Court

PRODUCT: Benupani

CARDINAL: 1998CriLJ841, 1992CriLJ2761, 108, 110, 1970CriLJ863, 6, 4, 5, 2000CriLJ3170 .4, 1994CriLJ2269 .5, one, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 160, 6

GPE: Poolpandi v. Superintendent, P.C., Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Explanationn, P.C., P.C., P.C., Deepak Mahajan's, P.C., P.C., Deepak Mahajan's

WORK_OF_ART: Questioning by

NORP: Statute