Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. K. Jagadeesan Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Decided On : Feb-23-1998

Court : Delhi

LAW: article 226 of the Constitution, section 279, section 279, section 119(1, Chapter IV, section 279(2

PERSON: R.C. Lahoti, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Chawla v., M.P. Tiwari, composition.12

CARDINAL: 8, 31, 29, 19-4-1996, 10,000, 12-8-1996, 2, 8, 8, 8, 2, 1-4-1962, 1992]195ITR607(SC, 119.11, 2, two, two

ORG: the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the ACMM, EO(I, the High Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the High Court, Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the High Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Income Tax Department, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Income Tax, Board, Income Tax Authorities, Board, Board, Board, Income Tax, Board, Income Tax Authority, Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Board, Board, Income Tax Authority, Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes

GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Explanationn, rejected.10, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Y.P., Explanationn

DATE: the assessment year 1985-86, 1961, six months, three months, 1961, 1991

WORK_OF_ART: 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 276CC of the Income Tax Act

NORP: P-1

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //