Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Dr. K. Jagadeesan Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.
Decided On : Feb-23-1998
Court : Delhi
LAW: article 226 of the Constitution, section 279, section 279, section 119(1, Chapter IV, section 279(2
PERSON: R.C. Lahoti, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Chawla v., M.P. Tiwari, composition.12
CARDINAL: 8, 31, 29, 19-4-1996, 10,000, 12-8-1996, 2, 8, 8, 8, 2, 1-4-1962, 1992]195ITR607(SC, 119.11, 2, two, two
ORG: the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the ACMM, EO(I, the High Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the High Court, Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the High Court, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Income Tax Department, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Income Tax, Board, Income Tax Authorities, Board, Board, Board, Income Tax, Board, Income Tax Authority, Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Board, Board, Income Tax Authority, Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Chennai, the Central Board of Direct Taxes
GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Explanationn, rejected.10, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Y.P., Explanationn
DATE: the assessment year 1985-86, 1961, six months, three months, 1961, 1991
WORK_OF_ART: 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 276CC of the Income Tax Act
NORP: P-1
ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly