Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rohini Education Society Vs. National Council for Teachers Education (Through Its Principal Secretary) and anr.

Decided On : May-13-1997

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 20(3, Article 32 of the Constitution or Article 226, Article 30(1, Constitution, Article 226 or, Article 32, the University Act, Section 14

DATE: 13 December, 1995, 22 January, 1996, 1993, May 11, 1996, Feb. 96, 19th March, 1996, the year 1995-96, 1st year, 1st year, 15 days, the first year, 8th June 1996, June 8, 1996, one year, previous years, previous years, this year, the one year, 19, '18.It, 19.We, June 23, 1995, 3 years, June 23, 1995, 1973, June 23, 1995, 3 years

NORP: F.28-14/95-NCTE, Punjab

ORG: the National Council for Teacher Education, the National Council for Teacher Education Act, the Northern Regional Committee, the council Name, Sharada Jain Sandhan Research Centre, C-196, Jaipur-302004, the States & Union Territories of the Region, Regulation, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh Chandigarh, M.A.Khader Regional Institute Education, NCERT, Inside Darbar School, J.N.Joshi Department of Education, Punjab University, Himachal Pradesh University, Committee, Recognition, Teachers Training Institute, Lovely Teachers Training Institute, Geeta Rattan Jindal Elementary Teachers Training Institute, the Hon'ble High Court, Committee, Principal &, the Education Department, Recognition, State, THEinstitute, the Government of N.C.T., the Senior Secondary Examination, Harsh Mehandi Ratta, an Expert Committee, Court, Court, Tata Cellular v. Union of India : AIR1996SC11, Maharastra State Board of Secondary, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, THE Supreme Court, Private Teachers Training Institutes, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Examination, Institutes, Court, Court, The Teachers Training Institutes, Training Institute, Teachers Training Institute, Madurai, State of, Court, Institute, Court, Institutes, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, A.P. Christians Medical Educational Society v. Government of A.P. Said :(SCC p.678, University, the University, Shri Venugopal, University, University, University, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Teachers Training Institutions, the State of Tamil Nadu, State, T.N., the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Courts, Court, Society, Institute, Authorities, Authorities, the Appellate Authority, Authorities, Bar, Society, Institute, Communication, the Delhi School Education Rules, Institute, Ete Institute, Institute, Institute, The Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 1.Composition, Six, 1.Prof, 66, 221, 2.Prof, 3/189, 282 003, 3.Prof, 6.Prof, 1.As, 100, 1, 8, only three, seven, 4, one, 3, 3,600.00, 12,000.00, 50, 100, 50, only 50, 5.As, 6.As, 9, 1985]1SCR29, 29, 11, 3, 1993]3SCR985, 21, 10, 1, 1, 5, 44

PRODUCT: Smt, Circulars

PERSON: Van Marg, Tilak Nagar, Rajasthan, Brahmananad Colony, Prem Nagar, Agra, Chatar Singh Mehta, Jaipur, Jaipur Dt 11.5.96 S.No.4, Ncte, Delhi Govt., Seema, Geeta Beniwal, Pashi, Kumud Kohli, Principal, Structure, Delhi Tuition, Bhupeshkumar Sheth, Shri Garg, Tamil Nadu, Paragraphs 18, Shri Venugopal, Shri Venugopal

GPE: Delhi, Summer Hills, Jaipur, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, B.Ms, Nct, Nct Delhi, N.M.Nageshwaramma, St.John's, Mbbs, N.M.Nageshwaramma

LOC: Varanasi, Govt, Govt

WORK_OF_ART: Quarter No.1

TIME: The minutes

LANGUAGE: English

PERCENT: 50%, 203)- 42.8%, 233)- 40.5%, 48%, 48%, 48%, 44%, 47%, 43%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //