Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shyam Telecom Ltd. Vs. A.R.M. Ltd.

Decided On : May-30-2008

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 37, Section 10, Section 14(2, Section 37(1, Section 37(1, Section 9, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 9;(b, Section 34.3, Section 10(1, Section 39(1, Section 39(1, the Arbitration Act, Section 37(1, the Arbitration Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 39, Section 10, Section 39, Section 10, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, Section 5, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 37.6, a Constitutional Bench, Section 6, Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 6(3, Section 6(3, Section 6(3, Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Constitution, The Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 4, Section 4, Section 100-A....7, the Arbitration Act, Section 39(1, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 39(1, The Arbitration Act, Section 39....10, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 10(1, Section 39(1, the Arbitration Act, Section 4, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 4 and Section 104, Section 104(1, Section 104(2, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Arbitration Act, Section 4 and Section 104(1, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 4, the Arbitration Act, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 104(1, Section 104(2, the Land Acquisition Act, the Succession Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 5, the Arbitration Act, Section 37, the Arbitration Act, Article 136 of the Constitution of India.15

NORP: J.1

ORG: Appellant, FAO, Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, dismissed.2, Counsel for the Respondent, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Appellant, Court, Sub-Section, Emphasis, Court, Court, Learned Senior Counsel, Court, Union of India, AIR 1970, Arbitration Act, Court, Pradeep Anand, I.T.C. Ltd., Ors, Union of India, Appeal, Appeal, Appeal, Orders, Court, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd., NTPC, Appellant, the Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, P.S. Sathappan (, Ors, Court, Court, a High Court, Letters Patent, Bombay High Court, the High Court, Court, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, New Kenilworth Hotel, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, CPC, the Letters Patent, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, the High Court, the Letters Patent and Section 104, CPC, Midnapore Peoples', Coop, Bank Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, P.S. Sathappan, the Apex Court, ITI Ltd., Siemens Public Communications Network Ltd., Court, The Supreme Court, Arbitration Act, Union of India, Letters, the Apex Court, this Hon'ble Court, the Supreme Court, Court, N.K. Pvt. Ltd.'s, Court, Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Chowdry, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Mohindra Supply Co.'s, Mohindra Supply Co.'s, the Apex Court, P.S. Sathappan's, P.S. Sathappan, The Apex Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Arbitration Act, P.S. Sathappan's, Court, Letters Patent, Sections 39, CPC, Guardians, P.S. Sathappan's, P.S. Sathappan, the Supreme Court, SBP & Co., Patel Engineering Ltd.

CARDINAL: 198/2004, two, 108, 4, 4, 5, 256, 26, 32, 3, 502, 3)3, 32, two, 2006CriLJ2903, 2002]3SCR1122, 9, 1962]3SCR497, 2, 11, 1982]1SCR187, one, 1982]1SCR187, 33, 34, three, 1962]3SCR497, four, 12, 1, 2, 22, 34, seven, 8

DATE: 1996, 1996, 17th September, 2004, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1940, 1940, 1996, 2000, 1996, 1996, 2005, 1940, 1940, 1940, 1940, 1966, the year 1983, 1940, 1882-10, 1940, Section 104(1, 1940, 1996, that....13, 1996, 1996, 14, 2005, 1996

GPE: OMP, Delhi, Delhi, A.S., Counsel, A.S., Khimiji, C.P.C., C.P.C., P.S., C.P.C.

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Siemens Anti, a Full Bench, Bench, Appellant

PERSON: Kaul, namely:(a, A.S. Dhupia, Kaul, Order, Order, A.S. Dhupia, Anr, Kaul, Kaul, Suresh Singh, Suresh Singh, LRs v. Andhra Bank Ltd., Singh, Vinita M. Khanolkar v., Pragna M. Pai, Counsel, Chandra Kanta Sinha v., Vinita Khanolkar, Sharda Devi, Singh, Chunilal Nand, Singh, Kamla Devi v. Khushal Kanwar, Anr, Singh, Subal Paul v., Malina Paul, Suresh Singh, Mohinder Supply, Khimji v. Jayaben De Kanya, Banwari Lal Radhey Mohan, Delhi, AIR1983Delhi402, Suresh Singh, Mohindra Supply, Sathappan, Mohindra Supply, Singh, Anr

LOC: Respondent, Single

ORDINAL: first, first

FAC: the Civil P.C.

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //