Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ms. Sadhna Chadha

Decided On : Dec-08-2003

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 260A, Section 25B, the Finance Act 2000, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 5 of the Act, Section 22, Section 23 of the Act, Section 23, section 22, Section 23, Section 23(1, Section 22, Section 260A of the Act, Section 143(1)(a

ORG: D.K. Jain, Tribunal, Connaught Place, State Bank of Saurashtra, Assessing, the Calcutta High Court, Hamilton & Co. Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal

NORP: J.1, ITAT

DATE: 1961, 25 February 2003, year 1996-97, 1 August 1995, 8,976/- per month, 1 March 1994, the previous year ended on, 31 March 1996, year 1996-97, five months, previous year, the earlier years, the assessment year 1996-97.3, the previous year, year 1996-97, annual, more than 12 months, annual, the year, the year, the years, 1 August 1995, previous year, the assessment year 1996-97, the relevant year, the previous year, the previous year, annual, annual, 1976, 1 April 1976, Annual, annual, year, annual, annual, the previous year, twelve months, annual, year, annual, year, the year, annual, annual, annual, the previous year, 12 months, annual, 12 months, the previous year, annual

PERSON: Delhi Bench-A, Prem Lata Bansal, Explanationn, Hamilton

GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 2,18,790/-, two, one, 22, 23, 1992]194ITR391(Cal, 8, 23, 1, 1, 1

FAC: Sections 22