Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jay Presstressed Products Ltd. and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Decided On : Sep-21-2001
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution.2, Section 7D to 7P, Constitution, Section 7-A, Section 7-A ', Section 14-B of the Act
PERSON: Anr, K.L. Gupta, Chinta Lingam v. Government, Sitamarhi v. Regional Provident Fund, Madras, Prakash Kothari v. Regional P.F., Kshetriya Khadi
ORG: The Regional Provident Fund, Bench, Regional Provident Fund, Act, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Gammon India Ltd., v. Union of India and Others, the High Court, Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India AIR, High Courts, High Courts, M/s. Inter State Transport Agency, Handloom Factory, Madurai M/s. Kandasamy Textiles, Handloom Merchants v. The Regional Provident Fund, Maharashtra & Goa, Union of India, Another v. Regional Provident Fund, Tribunal
DATE: 1981, L.I.C. 1015, 1952, 1950, 1979, 1803, 1983, 1990, 1990
WORK_OF_ART: 'Constitution'
FAC: Constitutional
CARDINAL: 1974)ILLJ489SC, 1968]1SCR274, 1971]2SCR871, 1957]1SCR233, 1, 2
GPE: Fatehchand, S.C., Sumedico Corporation
ORDINAL: second
PRODUCT: Constitutional