Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jay Presstressed Products Ltd. and anr Vs. Union of India and ors

Decided On : Sep-21-2001

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution.2, Section 7D to 7P, Constitution, Section 7-A, Section 7-A ', Section 14-B of the Act

PERSON: Anr, K.L. Gupta, Chinta Lingam v. Government, Sitamarhi v. Regional Provident Fund, Madras, Prakash Kothari v. Regional P.F., Kshetriya Khadi

ORG: The Regional Provident Fund, Bench, Regional Provident Fund, Act, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Gammon India Ltd., v. Union of India and Others, the High Court, Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Organo Chemical Industries v. Union of India AIR, High Courts, High Courts, M/s. Inter State Transport Agency, Handloom Factory, Madurai M/s. Kandasamy Textiles, Handloom Merchants v. The Regional Provident Fund, Maharashtra & Goa, Union of India, Another v. Regional Provident Fund, Tribunal

DATE: 1981, L.I.C. 1015, 1952, 1950, 1979, 1803, 1983, 1990, 1990

WORK_OF_ART: 'Constitution'

FAC: Constitutional

CARDINAL: 1974)ILLJ489SC, 1968]1SCR274, 1971]2SCR871, 1957]1SCR233, 1, 2

GPE: Fatehchand, S.C., Sumedico Corporation

ORDINAL: second

PRODUCT: Constitutional

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //