The Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Delhi Cloth Mills and General Company Ltd., Etc.

Decided On : Nov-11-1998

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court of Allahabad, Article 226 of the Constitution in the High Court of Allahabad, Section 80, the Constitution Bench Judgment of, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 72 of the Act, Section 72, the Constitution Bench, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 72, the Contract Act, Section 70, Section 70, Section 70, the Contract Act, Article 226, Section 23-A of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, Section 23, Butler 297 US 1, the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the Revenue Act, Constitution

PERSON: Dalveer Bhandari, no.1, no.1, Manohar Bhatia, Satya Narain, Mabin Ansari, no.7, Manohar Bhatia, P.O. Box, 8,22,569.41, youActual, U.P., Exbt, P.W.1/9, under:-M/s. Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Satya Narain, Mabin Ansari, Daljit Singh, Kanhaiya Lal Makund, Lal Saraf, Willoughby, Vol.1, Daljit Singh, Shanti Bhushan, N.V. Ramaiah Vs State, Kanhaiya Lal, Bench, Shiv Shankar Dal Mills, Haryana, Amar Nath Om Prakash, Amar Nath Om Prakash, George C. Palmer, George S. Palmer, Charan Lal Sahu v. Union, Manohar Bhatia, Satya Narain, Mabin Ansari, Exhibit PW-1/8, Charan Lal Sahu, Parens patria.37

NORP: J.1, duty11, Excise, Company, American, American, Australian, American, Australian, Canadian, enriched.33

DATE: the period between March, 1973, April, 1976, 21.2.1978, September 21, 1978, 17.10.1994:'14, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 8, 9, 14, 1975, 19.9.1975, 19th September, 1975, 29.10.1977, 17, 8th February, 1978, 12742, 1929, 1934, '19, 1997, 1986, 1943, 1948, '27, 1986, '29, 1989, 1936, 1928, 1933, every year, the year, the year

GPE: States, the State of Rajasthan.3, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, no.7, the State of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Advocate, S.No, Allahabad, the State of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, the Stateof Rajasthan, the United States, Shiba, India, Molam, United States, Jefferson, US, Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, U.P.

ORG: the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, State, Theplaintiff, Uttar Pradesh, State of Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court, the All India Distillers' Association, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Excise Department, the State of Uttar Pradesh, CPC, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the State of Uttar Pradesh, no.2, the Allahabad High Court, the State Government, the State Government, Audit and Taxation, no.1, the State Government of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the Government of Rajasthan, the State Government, U.P., the Excise Department, the U.P. Government, P.W.I, The Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Civil Lines, the Excise Authorities, ExciseCommissioner, the High Court, the Excise Authorities, Civil Lines, the Excise Authorities, U.P., PW-2, Audit and Administration, the State of Rajasthan, the State Government, the Rajasthan State Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd., the State of Rajasthan, IAS, State, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajas, the State of Rajasthancannot, theState, the Supreme Court, High Courts, AIR 1920 Bom, State, the Supreme Court, Mafatlal Industries, no.1, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh and Others AIR, AP, Court, State, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Andhra Pradesh judgment(supra, Court, Sections, Court, Court, Court, Division Bench, Lordships, Vs State, AC 32, Nelson Vs Larholt, Court, Court, Court, Mafatlal Industries Ltd., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Lordships, Lordships, Legislature, State, Lordships of the Supreme Court, Shiv Shankar Dal Mills, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships of the Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, AIR1990SC1480, The Supreme Court, the Canadian Court, Air Canada, The Canadian Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court, Congress, the United States Supreme Court, State, State, Court, State, the Supreme Court, Mafatlal Industries, no.1, the State of U.P. Rs, U.P., Lordships, Mafatlal Industries, State, Government of Rajasthan, the State Government, IAS Officers, State, PW-2, Audit and Taxation, the State of Rajasthan, State, the State of Rajas, Board of the Companyis, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, Rs.8,22,569.41/-, Rs.8,22,569.41/-

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, 8th, third, third, third, third

CARDINAL: 31.1.1977, 14.11.1979.5, 21.4.82, 2., 3., 1, 4., 5, 6., 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 7, 15, 16, 8, three, 2, 16, 15, 8, two, 9.10, more than 97, 24,09,839.42, 1., 15,87,270.01, 1, No.2, 1, two, 98, 29/30.8.1977, 15,87,270.01, 8,22,569.41, 82, 216, 23.6.75, 19752.43, 17, 13.1.78, seven, 15, 17, 1959]1SCR1350, 192, 177, 559, 12, 13, 5, 539, 1, 361, 1959]1SCR1350, 14, 15, 1968]3SCR214, 1, 72, nine, 1980]1SCR1170, two to three, 38, 39, 1985]2SCR72, 1985]3SCR561, 38, 59, 161, 80, 477, 859, 291, 386.31, one, one, Nine, 15,87,270.01, seven, 7, 35, 1, 13.1.78, 1, 38, 39, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, No.2, 1, 2, 24,09,839.42, No.2

PRODUCT: no.1, no.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, No.1, No.1

FAC: the Civil Writ Petition

MONEY: 13, 98.67 per cent, 98.67 per cent, 98.67 per cent, almost one billion dollars, 98.67 per cent, 18 per cent

EVENT: a Constitution Bench

LANGUAGE: English, English

WORK_OF_ART: The Law of Restitution

PERCENT: 18%, 18%