Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Surender Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Decided On : Jul-25-2005
Court : Delhi
LAW: Rule 24, Article 226
PERSON: Sanjiv Khanna, Order, Order, Order, Order, Hoti Lal
ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Authority, Tribunal, Original Application, the Central Administrative Tribunal, inter alia, Authorities, Tribunal, Court, Constable, the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, the Chief Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, MCD Unani, Najafgarh, Court, the Appellate Authority, Union of India, U.P. SRTC, Thankur v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC, Constable, the Writ Petition
CARDINAL: 19.9.2002, 19.9.2002, five, 34, five, five, 1999.6, five, five, four, 1, 227, 2, five
DATE: 2387/2004, 28.1.2002, 10th May, 2001, November, 2002, June, 1997 to June, 1999, 57, 11, 6, 59, 14 days, 137 days, the period February, 1996 to November, 1998, 10th May, 2001, 28th January, 2002, 2387/2004, 19th September, 2002, 137 days, June, 1997 to June, five years, nine months, September, 1999, 137 days, 137 days, 137 days, between June, 1997 and June, 1999, 57, 11, 6, 14 days, 1978, 1980, 2 3, '10, 2001, 2003)IILLJ267SC, a period of, nine months, five years, 137 days, a period of, two years
FAC: The Enquiry Officer
ORDINAL: 6th, 11th
LOC: Central District
GPE: Delhi, pay.5, Rajpur Road, Delhi, India, Kumar
PRODUCT: Application
WORK_OF_ART: Orders