Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Surender Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Decided On : Jul-25-2005

Court : Delhi

LAW: Rule 24, Article 226

PERSON: Sanjiv Khanna, Order, Order, Order, Order, Hoti Lal

ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Authority, Tribunal, Original Application, the Central Administrative Tribunal, inter alia, Authorities, Tribunal, Court, Constable, the Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, the Chief Medical Officer, Civil Hospital, MCD Unani, Najafgarh, Court, the Appellate Authority, Union of India, U.P. SRTC, Thankur v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC, Constable, the Writ Petition

CARDINAL: 19.9.2002, 19.9.2002, five, 34, five, five, 1999.6, five, five, four, 1, 227, 2, five

DATE: 2387/2004, 28.1.2002, 10th May, 2001, November, 2002, June, 1997 to June, 1999, 57, 11, 6, 59, 14 days, 137 days, the period February, 1996 to November, 1998, 10th May, 2001, 28th January, 2002, 2387/2004, 19th September, 2002, 137 days, June, 1997 to June, five years, nine months, September, 1999, 137 days, 137 days, 137 days, between June, 1997 and June, 1999, 57, 11, 6, 14 days, 1978, 1980, 2 3, '10, 2001, 2003)IILLJ267SC, a period of, nine months, five years, 137 days, a period of, two years

FAC: The Enquiry Officer

ORDINAL: 6th, 11th

LOC: Central District

GPE: Delhi, pay.5, Rajpur Road, Delhi, India, Kumar

PRODUCT: Application

WORK_OF_ART: Orders

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //