Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Abdul Hamid and ors. Vs. Charanjit Mehra and ors.

Decided On : Oct-17-1995

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 10, Section 106, Section 53A, the Rent Control Act, Section 104, Order 43 Rule 1 Cpc, Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code, Section 10, Section 106, Section 10, Section 10, Order 43 Rule 1, Section 10, Section 10, Order 6 Rule 17 Civil Procedure Code, Order 6 Rule 17, Section 10, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Section 106, the Rent Control Act, Section 10, Order 6 Rule 17 Cpc, Section 106, Section 106, the Rent Control Act, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, the Rent Control Act

PERSON: M. Jagannadha Rao, Hafiz Mohd, Hafiz Mohd, S. Sat Jit Singh, Jayaben D. Kania, Kumar R. Langi, Ray C.J., Ray, Kumar R. Cangi's, Kumar R. Canji's, S. Satjit, Hafiz Mohd, Rajasthan, Lpa, Kumar L. Cangi's, Jugal Kishore's, Gauri Shankar, Jagan Nath, Chander Bhan, Jagan Nath

CARDINAL: 1, 10, 2840/93, 2, eight, 6000.00, 29.5.89, eight, 2.12.1986, 2, 6, 2840/93, 8, 1500.00, 3, two, 4, 10, 1500.00, 5, eight, 2840/93, 8, 6, 1984)1SCC358, 1982]1SCR187, three, 8), 1975]1SCR550, 68,000.00, 4, 15, 1975]1SCR550, 116, 117, 1975]1SCR550, 11, 12, 1984)1SCC358, 35/82, 30.4.81, 19.3.82, 1.4.82, 13, three, 14, 15, eight, eight, 16, 17, 1500.00, 24.11.93, 18.11.93, 1500.00, 25.11.1993, 24.11.93, 25.11.93, 1500.00, 30.11.93, 25.11.93, 8.12.93, 1500.00, 8.12.93, 15.12.93, two, 18, 19, 15.12.93, 18.11.93, 1500.00, 20, 1500.00, 1, 22, 23, two, one, 24, eight, 750.00, 8, two, 8, 25

GPE: Suit No., New Delhi, December,1990, New Delhi, December,1990, Shah Babulal's, New York, Singh, Delhi, Delhi, Shah Babulal's, IA

DATE: 2000, 1989, 1966, 2.12.1986, 1989, 2840/93, 2.12.1986, 29.5.1989, 1989, 1966, 1964, 6 months', 16 years, 1981, 1982, that day, 21, several years later, several years, 1989, 1986, four years

ORG: the Letters Patent (Lahore, the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act, Letters Patent, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Rent Control Act, Clause 10 of Letters Patent (Lahore, the Delhi High Court, University of Delhi, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Paliwal, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Paliwal's, Single Judges, Court, the Supreme Court, The House Insurance Co., Letters Patent Appeal, Supreme Court, Letters Patent Appeal, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Letters Patent, Court, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Clause 10 of Letters Patent (Lahore, the Supreme Court, Letters Patent, Delhi High Court, University of Delhi, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, The Letters Patent Appeal, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Letters Patent Appeals, CPC, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore's, the Supreme Court, the Rent Control Act, Civil Court, the Civil Court, the High Court Along, Fao, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Trust Ltd., The Supreme Court, Bindra Tent House, Bindra Tent House, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Rent Control Act, the Civil Court

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, third, 16th, first, second, third

TIME: 3500.00 p.m., 750.00 p.m., 6000.00 p.m., 3500.00 p.m., 750.00 p.m., 3500.00 p.m., 850.00 p.m., 6000.00 p.m., 3500.00 p.m.

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, allowed?Point 1, The Full Bench Judgment, Point 2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //