Skip to content

Set Discovery P. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-16-2008

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 36, the TRAI Act, Section 13, Section 29, Section 34, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, the Interconnection Regulations, Section 36, Section 36, the TRAI Act, Section 11, Section 12, Section 11.14, Section 5, Section 9, Section 7 B of the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 8, Act 2 of 2000, Section 14, Section 11;e, Section 11;f, Section 11.12, the Interconnection Regulations, the Interconnection Regulations, Section 35, Section 37, Section 15, Section 28, Section 37, the Interconnection Regulations, Constitution, the CTN Act, Section 2(1)(k, Section 11(1)(a)(iv, Section 11(1)(b)(iv, Section 11(1)(d, Section 11(2, the CTN Act, Section 11, Section 11(1)(b, Section 11(1)(d, Section 11, Section 11(1)(a, Section 11, Section 11, Section 14, Regulation 4, Section 11, Section 13, Section 36 of the Act, Section 29, Section 34, Section 14, Section 36, Section 37, Section 14, the TRAI Act, Section 34, Section 29, Section 14, the TRAI Act, Section 36

PERSON: Siddharth Mridul, Articles 14, Aditya Narayan, Mehta, Local, Judicial Magistrate, business;b, levy, levy, Broadcaster, Petitioners, jurisdiction inter, Articles 14, follows-4.1, Broadcaster, Reasons

NORP: J.1, Rules

ORG: the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act 1997, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Clauses 4.1, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, Clauses 4.1, this Hon'ble Court, Star India P. Ltd., Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Ors, Authority, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, the Central Government, Authority, Authority, Authority, Appellate Tribunal, the Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate Tribunal, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Commission, the National Consumer Redressal Commission, Authority, Authority, Cognizance of offences.-, Authority, Authority, Authority, Clause(c, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, Multi System, Star India P. Ltd., Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Ors, Court, Authority, Authority, Authority, State, Learned Senior Counsel, Authority, the Delegate/Authority, Preamble, Authority, Authority, Regulators, the Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate Tribunal, TDSAT, Authority, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Central Government, Authority, Quarry Owners Association, The Supreme Court, the State Government, House, the State Legislature, the State Government, Authority, Set Discovery Private Limited, Clauses 3.3, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Service) Interconnection, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Petitioners, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Messrs J.K. Communications, the Central Government, The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, Disconnection of TV Channel Signals, Petitioners, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., Telecom Regulatory Authority, Legislature, Indian Aluminium Co., Kerala State Electricity Board, Brothers, Authority, Brothers, Authority, Government, the Telecom Regulatory Appellate Authority of India (Amendment) Act, Authority, the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., Petitioners, the Statement of Objects, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Ordinance, Group, Central Government, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Ordinance, Authority, TDSAT, Authority, Petitioners, Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services, Reliance, Registry, inter alia, Sub Section 1 of Section 11, Court, CMM, Parliament, Appellate Tribunal, Regulation, the Division Bench, Star India P. Ltd., Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Ors, Clauses 4.1, Regulation, the Appellate Tribunal

DATE: 1997, 2004, 2004, 12th January, 2005, 25th January, 2005, 12th January 2005.2, 29th October, 2002, monthly, the 15th, monthly, as early as January, 2004, the 5th of November 2004, the 18th of November, 2004, 21st December, 2004, the 23rd of December, 2004, later than 28th December, 28th December, 2004, August, 2004, 29th December, 2004, the 30th December, 2004, 12th January, 2005, 2004, two days, 13th January, 2005, 12th January, 2005, 25th January, 2005, 1997, 25th January, 10th December, 2004, 1997, 1885, 13 of 1885, 2000, 1969, 1986, 1885, every day, 2004, one month, two working days, monthly, 2004, 10th December, 2004, 14th December, 2004, 2004, 12th January 2005, 25th January, 2005, 1957, 2006, 10 of 2006, 2004, three weeks, three weeks, three weeks, three weeks, 2000, 2004, 2000, October, 1999, 2004, three weeks, three weeks, one month, 30 days, 13th January, 2005, 25th January, 2005, 12th January, 2005, 1997, 10th December, 2004, 30 days

CARDINAL: 4.1, 4.2, 4, Three, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 14.12.2004.4, 4, 4, 2004.6, 4, one lac forty thousand, 3, 4.2, 4, 2005.9, 4, 4.2, 3, 146(2008)DLT455, 1, 1, 4, 1, two, 1, 54, 68, 1986(C, 13, 1885(b, one, two, two, 1, 1, 1, 4, 24, 1, 1, 1, two, two, 9 to 12, 4.9.2006, 19, 4.9.2006, two, at least one, one, two, more than one, 4.1, 4.2, two, two, 4.4, 1976]1SCR70, 25.3.2000, 24.1.2000, 1, 3, between two, one, 4.1, 4.9.2006, 4.2, two, between two, between two, 3, 34, 3, 4.2

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

FAC: Telecommunication, Regulation 4

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, second, first

GPE: w.r.e.f, India, States, India, WP, Telecom, Proviso

LOC: Executive

EVENT: Proviso to Regulation, Sections 29

TIME: under this Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //