Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shyam Lal Saraf (Also Shyam Lal Saraf V. Ito.). - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : Nov-09-1992

Court : Delhi

LAW:

the IT Act, the WT Act

ORG:

ORDERR, ITO, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Smt, Tribunal, Smt, S. 69C, Departmental Representative, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, Smt, ITO, Tribunal, Smt, ITO, Smt, ITO, Tribunal, Smt, Tribunal, AAC, AAC, Tribunal, Smt, Tribunal, Tribunal, Departmental Representative, ITO, Tribunal, CIT, D. D. Lamba & Co., CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

PERSON:

A.M., Laxmi Devi, Laxmi Devi, Laxmi Devi, Shri Krishan Kumar, Laxmi Devi, Sushila Devi, Kamlesh Kumari, Laxmi Devi, Kamlesh Kumari, Sushila Devi, Laxmi Devi, Kamlesh Kumari, Sushila Devi, Laxmi Devi, Laxmi Devi', Shri Shyam Lal, Laxmi Devi, Explanationn 1 to S. 271(1)(c, Addl, Addl, Ram Prakash

ORDINAL:

first, first, first, second, second

CARDINAL:

10,000, 1,100, 5,100, 10,000, 29.960, 10,000, 1,100, 10,000, three, 10,000, 10,000, two, 1,100, 10,000, 10,000, 1,100, 18, 10,421, four, 19.42, three, 2,34,272, 2,79,000, 44,728, 2,300, one, three, three, 93,311, two, 69,119, 24,191, four, three, 93,311, two, 1981]128ITR564(All, 1981]128ITR559(All, 93,311, three, 93,311, 5, 143(3

DATE:

1975, 1977-78, the assessment year, the assessment year, 1977-78, the assessment year, item.11, October, 1975, 20th Aug., 1986, this year, this year, '15, 1980-81, June, 1980, Oct., 1979, 1st April, 1976, Explanationn 1, 36

GPE:

asst, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, inadvertence.19

FAC:

Revenues, Departmental, Revenues

QUANTITY:

30.052 kgs., 10.518 kgs

NORP:

Statute