Durgeshwari Devi Vs. International Development Research Centre — Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Decided on: May-19-1999
Court: Delhi
LAW: Order 39,Rules 1, Section 86, Order 12, Section 151, Section 17, Section 18(1, Section 19 of the Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20, Order 12 Rule 6, Rule 6, Section 116 of the Evidence Act
PERSON: M.K. Sharma, Jor Bagh, Governors, Karnataka Handloom Dev., Surjit Sachdev v. Kazakhstan Investment Services Pvt, Lesser, Sri Ram Pasricha v. Jagannath, Singh v. Sita Ram Agarwalla
NORP: J.1
GPE: New Delhi, India, Centre, Canada, the German Democratic Republic, Jaikaran
CARDINAL: 1.4.1997, 30.5.97, 2., 2, 3., three, 4., 6, 5., 6., 7, 8, 9, One, 2.6.1983, 10, 11, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 61(1996, one, 16, 7.2.1994, 1.4.1994 to 31.3.1997, 31.3.1999, 1.4.1994, 17, 18, 19, 1977]1SCR395, 20., 21, 22, 23, 24
DATE: 30th May, 1997, a period of, 10 years, 2004, three years, five years, 1st April, 1994 to 31st March, 1999, the period of three years i.e., 1st April, 1994 to 31st March, 1997, 40,000/-per month, the remaining two years i.e., 1st April, 1997 to 31st March, 1999, the first three years, two years, before 31st March, 1997, 1st April, 1997, 1.4.1997, 31.3.1997, 2603, 1998, two months, today
ORG: CPC, inter alia, the State of Canada, the Government of India, Court, State, the Central Government, Government, the Government of Canada, Parliament of Canada, the International Development Research Centre Act & I.D.R.C General, the Parliament of Canada, Counsel, the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, General Counsel, International Development Research Centre, the Supreme Court, New Central Jute Mills Co.Ltd. & Anr, the International Development Research Centre, the Centre in Section 4 of the Act, the International Development Research Centre Account, Account, the International Development Research Centre Act, Income-Tax, the Minister of Finance, Centre, Veb Deautiraht Seereederei Rostock, the Government of German Democratic Republic, Legislature, the Patna High Court, English Courts, P.S.Bedi v. Project & Equipment Corpn, India Ltd.
ORDINAL: third, first, 7th
PERCENT: 30%
MONEY: one million dollars
PRODUCT: DLT 386