Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Narendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : May-02-2008

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 3(1, Section 19(1, 42nd Amendment Act, the Constitution either.(3, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, Section 12, Section 2(2)(b, Article 359(1, Article 359, Section 12-A of COFEPOSA, Section 12-A, Section 2(2)(b, Section 2(2)(b, Section 12-A, Section 12-A, Section 2(2)(b, Section 3 of, Section 2(2, Section 2(2, Section 5-A of, Article 22.(7, Constitution, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141, Article 141, Article 141 of the Constitution, Article 141, The Constitution Bench, Section 6, Section 8, Section 3 of SAFEMA, Section 6, Section 2, Section 12A, Section 12A(1, Section 2(2, Section 12A(3, Section 2, Order of Detention of Late Roshan Lal, Article 22(5, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, Article 22, the Fundamental Rights, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 22 of the Constitution, Section 3, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, Section 3(1, Section 3, Section 2, Section 3(2, Article 22 of the Constitution, Section 11, the Customs Act, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, the Customs Act, Section 111, Section 113, Article 22(5, Constitution, Section 3(3, Article 22 of the Constitution as, Section 3(3, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 2, the Customs Act, Section 2(2)(b, the Customs Act, Section 2(2)(b, Section 2 of SAFEMA, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, Section 3, Section 12(1, Section 3 of COFEPOSA, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 3 of COFEPOSA

PERSON: Vikramajit Sen, Order, Dhab Khatika, Khasra No, Jawahar Nagar, Batala Road, Order, Detention Order, MISA, Lal Wazirabadi, Roshan Lal, Roshan Lal, Detention Order, Roshan Lal, Petitioner, Late Roshan Lal, Roshan Lal, Sheela Wati, Roshan Lal, Sheela Wati, Amratlal Prajivandas, Articles 14, Articles 14, Amratlal, Dhanwanti Devi, Dhanwanti Devi, Granites, Gurnam Kaur, Gerard v. Worth, Wilfrid Greene, M.R. Apparao, Bench, Manohar Lal, Dawood Shaikh v. State, R.L. Vaid, Akhil Gujarat, Mac Dermot, Atkin, Megarry, Russell L.J., Morris, Bahadur Singh, Jal Nigam, Chandra Jain, Uday Narain Pandey, Bagai, Bench, Bench, Roshan Lal, Roshan Lal, Sheela Wati, Roshan Lal and/or, Shri Om Prakash, Roshan Lal and/or, Sheela Wati, Karimaben K. Bagad v. State, Roshan Lal, Sheela Wati, Roshan Lal, Sheela Wati, M.J. Rao, Amratlal, Sheela Wati, Petitioner, Bagai, Bagai, Roshan Lal, Roshan Lal, MISA, Order, Roshan Lal, Roshan Lal, Bagai, Roshan Lal, Order, Bagai, Roshan Lal, just.14, Roshan Lal, Petitioner, Bagai, Bhayana, Bagai, Shalini Soni v. Union, Order, Roshan Lal, MISA, Order, Late Roshan Lal, Arvind Shergill, Bagai, Roshan Lal, MISA, MISA, Bagai, Bagai, Roshan Lal, Order, Bagai, Khera v. Administrator, Sher Mohammad v. State, Aslam Ahmed Zahire Ahmed Shaik, V.K. Saraf, Babbar, Detention Order, Shri Roshan Lal, Shri Kanshi, Lal Khatri, M.J. Rao, Petitioner, Singh, Nisha Malhotra, Shri Sanjeev Sharma, Sanjeev Sharma, Tejwant Singh, Sangeeta Bhayana, Bhayana, Gore, Bhayana, Bhayana, Toolsidass Jewraj v. Addl, Barkha Babbar

DATE: 19.12.1974, 1974, 1976, 1971, 25.6.1975, 21.3.1977, 19.12.1974, the following day, 23.3.1977, 1995CriLJ426, the 39th, 21, 22, 1941, 1936, 1941, Para 20, 1970, 1971, 1062, 1972, 10.7.1985, 10.10.1985, 28.7.1985, 1975, 1979, 4.8.1977, 11.1.1995, May 1994, four months, four months, 25.6.1975, 19.12.1974 Late, twenty four months, one day, Two years, 1976, 19.12.1974, a few months, 17.1.1975, 1975, two decades, 16.4.2008, ten days, February 2004, 05.06.1997, 1996, two months, 1359/200322, 23.8.2002, 23.8.2002, 14.8.2002, 1962, a couple of days, five days, more than fifteen days, 10 months, 1995 1 AD, 1169, 2003 1, 2001

ORG: Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, Smugglers & Foreign Exchange Manipulators, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Maintenance of Internal Security Act, Kanshi Ram, COFEPOSA, Criminal Writ Petition, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, SAFEMA, the Supreme Court of India, Judgment, Parliament, COFEPOSA, COFEPOSA, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Parliament, the Presidential Order, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Court, SAFEMA, ineffective.(5, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, COFEPOSA, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Union of India, B.T. Jayaram v. State, Girnar Traders, Maharashtra : AIR2007SC3180, the Court of Appeal, Lancaster Motor Co., London) Ltd., Bremith Ltd., Court, Municipal Corporation, Paris Ltd., ER, the Court of Appeal, Lancaster Motor Co., London) Ltd., Bremith Ltd., M.R., State, U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd., Court, Arnit Das v. State of Bihar, Court, Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd., Jindal Exports Ltd., Lordships, the High Court, the Supreme Court, A.P., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Delhi Administration, Lordships, Islamic Academy of Education, Punjab National Bank, State, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Escorts Ltd., Central Excise, Euclid, London Graving Dock Co. Ltd., Horton 1951, AC 737, Parliament, Home Office, Dorset Yacht Co., Parliament, Herrington, British Railways Board, Union of India, the Apex Court, Court, U.P. State Brassware Corp. Ltd., Court, Competent Authority, Lordships, Court, Detenue, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Counsel for the Petitioner, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, the Supreme Court, Chandmal Jain, Union of India v. Mohanlal Likumal Punjabi, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, The Petitioner, Shri Narendra Kumar, the Supreme Court, Division Bench, Amritsar, the Competent Authority, the Revenue Authorities, the Supreme Court of, SAFEMA, the Legal Heir of Late Roshan Lal, Detenue, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, COFEPOSA, COFEPOSA, the Proclamation of Emergency, Detention, SAFEMA, COFEPOSA, the Special Leave Petition, the Detaining Authority, SAFEMA, Court, Counsel for the Respondents, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Court, Court, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Order, Sections 3 and 5A of COFEPOSA., State, Court, SAFEMA, COFEPOSA, State, SAFEMA, COFEPOSA, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, the Detaining Authority, Lordships, COFEPOSA, The Writ Court, Union of India, Ramesh v. State of, COFEPOSA, COFEPOSA, COFEPOSA, the Counter Affidavit, the State Government, the Counter Affidavit, Respondents 3, the State Government, Telex, the Punjab Government, Detenue, SAFEMA, Court, COFEPOSA, Detenue, COFEPOSA, the State Government, the Central Government, Court, Union Territory, Delhi Administration, SAFEMA, Union of India, the Supreme Court, SAFEMA, the Counter Affidavit, the State of Punjab, the Central Government, the Ministry of Finance, the State Government of Punjab, COFEPOSA, the Government of Punjab, Central Government, the Competent Authority, the Appellate Tribunal, SAFEMA, Respondents, SAFEMA, the Judgment of the Chief Justice, Court, the Supreme Court, Respondents, SAFEMA, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, SAFEMA, the Supreme Court, Affidavit, Mohanlal Likumal Punjabi, the Competent Authority, COFEPOSA, the Central Government, SAFEMA, The Competent Authority, Hon'ble High Court, the Competent Authority, Court, the Competent Authority, Respondents, Court, Joint, the Government of India, Shri Manpreet Singh Oberoi, Respondents, Petitioners, Manpreet Singh Oberoi, Shri Manpreet Singh Oberoi, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, COFEPOSA, The Supreme Court, COFEPOSA, COFEPOSA, SAFEMA, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, COFEPOSA, SAFEMA, SAFEMA, Court, Counsel for the Petitioners, Sheetal, Maharashtra 2006, Dalbir Singh v. Union of India, Petitioners, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, S.P. Goyal v. Union of India, a High Court, Petitioners, the Supreme Court, Customs, Lordships, Respondents, Parliament, the Supreme Court

CARDINAL: 29.5.1978, 31, 745, 29.5.1978, 2, 5.11.1974, 22.3.1977, 220/1979, Nine, 1, 5, 19, 21, 57, 1996)6SCC44, 2006CriLJ2142, 2001]1SCR1085, 1, 2, 1, 2000CriLJ2971, 4., 2001]3SCR479, 2002]2SCR661, Three, two, 2002CriLJ4295, 2004CriLJ1359, 2004CriLJ4246, 6, 2004(173)ELT113(SC, 761, 9, 2, No.2, 1, 2, 10, one, two, 2006)1SCC368, 2006)ILLJ496SC, Three, Nine, 24.2.1978, 1, 11.1.1978, 1998CriLJ3627, 8.8.1977, 11.1.1978, 2.2.1979, 5.6.1997, 0.4, 0-17, 220/1979, 12.5.1994, 56, 3, 3, 5.11.1974, 25.6.1975, 22.3.1977, 22.3.1977, two, 5A, 1980CriLJ1487, 2000CriLJ4055, 11.2.1975, 4, 11.2.1975, 5.2.1975, 5.2.1975, 11.2.1975, 2, 1987(28)ELT212(Del, 1975]3SCR154, 1989CriLJ1447, 19.12.1974, 22.3.1977, 20, three, 44.61, 5.80, 33.71, approximately 4.15, 2.74, 23.8.2002.23, 113, SAFEMA.24, 83, 2002ECR336(SC, 1991(53)ELT518(SC, 14.5.2003

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Om Prakash, the Detention Orders

GPE: India, Karnataka, Delhi, India, Karnataka, Gujarat, Zee, Sandham, Counsel, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, India, Smt, Gujarat, Harish, Delhi, Delhi, the United States of America, Counsel, Counsel, Bhatia

PERCENT: more than Nine Judges

PRODUCT: Article, Lordship, Detenue, COFEPOSA.15, Preamble, Representation, Detenue, Report, Lordship, Judgment

QUANTITY: 294 Lord Reid

ORDINAL: first, third, firstly, Firstly, Secondly, fourth

FAC: Late Roshan Lal, Representation, Representation, Representation, Representation, Manpreet Oberoi

NORP: Punjab, Affidavits

EVENT: the Preamble of that Act, Customs Act

LOC: Single Judge

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //