Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Aggarwal Dharmarth Hospital Society (Regd.) Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Decided On : Mar-19-1990

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 10(22A, section 271, section 271, section 139(1, section 271, section 271, section 139, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271

PERSON: Kathuria, Shri C. S. Aggarwal, Shri Aggarwal, Shri Aggarwal, Explanationn 3, Explanationn 3, Nirmala Devi, Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, Hanutram Ramprasad, Behari Lal Lalta Prasad v. ITO

DATE: 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 19 completed months, the day, year 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 1975, Explanationn 3 to section 271, an assessment year, that year, Explanationn 3', the year

CARDINAL: 23-10-1986, 1961.2, 30-6-1981, 10-2-1983, 24, 8,290, 11, 12, 11, 12, 3, 3, 1, 1, one thousand five hundred, 8,681, 1,500, 3, 271, 1, 3, 11, 12, 11, 12, 3, 3, 3, only one, 3, 1-4-1976, 1-4-1976, 148, 3, 271(1, 271(1, 204, 24, 3, 1979]118ITR507(SC, 1921, 1, 1977]108ITR345(SC, 11, 12, 1983]144ITR583(All, 1

ORG: Appellate, Appellate, NIL, NIL, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Legislature, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd., The Supreme Court, Rowlatt, the Supreme Court, Smt, CIT, Departmental Representative, CIT

GPE: New Delhi, Explanationn

QUANTITY: 12-2-1986

FAC: Departmental, Departmental

MONEY: 200 per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Tarulata Shyam v.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //