Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Aggarwal Dharmarth Hospital Society (Regd.) Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Decided On : Mar-19-1990
Court : Delhi
LAW: section 10(22A, section 271, section 271, section 139(1, section 271, section 271, section 139, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271, section 271
PERSON: Kathuria, Shri C. S. Aggarwal, Shri Aggarwal, Shri Aggarwal, Explanationn 3, Explanationn 3, Nirmala Devi, Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, Hanutram Ramprasad, Behari Lal Lalta Prasad v. ITO
DATE: 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 19 completed months, the day, year 1981-82, the assessment year 1981-82, 1975, Explanationn 3 to section 271, an assessment year, that year, Explanationn 3', the year
CARDINAL: 23-10-1986, 1961.2, 30-6-1981, 10-2-1983, 24, 8,290, 11, 12, 11, 12, 3, 3, 1, 1, one thousand five hundred, 8,681, 1,500, 3, 271, 1, 3, 11, 12, 11, 12, 3, 3, 3, only one, 3, 1-4-1976, 1-4-1976, 148, 3, 271(1, 271(1, 204, 24, 3, 1979]118ITR507(SC, 1921, 1, 1977]108ITR345(SC, 11, 12, 1983]144ITR583(All, 1
ORG: Appellate, Appellate, NIL, NIL, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Legislature, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd., The Supreme Court, Rowlatt, the Supreme Court, Smt, CIT, Departmental Representative, CIT
GPE: New Delhi, Explanationn
QUANTITY: 12-2-1986
FAC: Departmental, Departmental
MONEY: 200 per cent
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first
PRODUCT: Tarulata Shyam v.