Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Duncan International (India) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction and ors.

Decided On : Jul-21-2000

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Act No.1, Article 254(2, Article 254 of the Constitution of India, Article 254 of the Constitution, Section 32(1, Section 22(1, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3 reads:- ', Section 3 of the Industries (Development and Regulations) Act, Section 3'14, Section 4 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Chapter-III, Section 18, Section 17, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 22, Section 16, Section 17, Section 15, Section 18, Section 20, Section 26, Section 32, Article 254(2, Constitution, Article 254(2, Constitution, Section 18 of the Act, Article 39 of the Constitution, List 2, List 2, List 2, List 3, List 1, Section 3 of the Act, Section 1, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254 of the Constitution, Article 254(2) held:- 'The important thing, Article 254(2, Article 254(1, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22(1, Section 22, Section 22(1, Section 18, Section 24, Section 26, Section 29, Section 29, Section 29, Section 456, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act

PERSON: ORDERDevinder Gupta, J.P. Goenka, A. Goenka, Bakshi, Nos.6, O.P. Chandak, Nos.6, Chidambaram, O.P. Chandak, Chandak, P.K. Basu, Chandak, P. Chidambaran, Kapil Sibbal, A.M. Singhvi, Tika Ramji, Kannan Devan, Nicholas, No.7, Netaji Subhash Chand, Alipur, Shri Bakshi, Metropolitan Magistrate, Shri O.P. Chandak, Shri Chandak, P.K. Basu

NORP: J.1

ORG: Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, AIJM, Woodland Estate, Alipore, Anglo India Jute Mills Company Limited, Anglo India Jute Mills, the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, the Anglo India Jute Mills Company Limited, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Woodland Estate, Alipore, Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions, State Bank of India, Nos.8, Nos.8, Company, Company, Notice, Civil Court at, Alipore Court, Alipore Court, Calcutta High Court, Suit No.5/96, IFCI, WB Tenancy Act, Parliament, the Concurrent List and Union List, the Concurrent List, WB Tenancy Act, Rent Control Authority, Civil Court, Calcutta High Court, IFCI, IFCI, Nos.8, IFCI, M/S Khaitan & Company Advocates, Nos.8, the palnt register, sham, Nos.8, Operating Agency, a Sick Industrial Company, Parliament, Sick Industrial Company, Industrial Company, Industrial Company, Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Central Government, Board, The Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, Sick Industrial Company, the Operating Agency, Operating Agencies, Sick Industrial Company, the Sick Industrial Company, the Sick Industrial Company, Company, the Sick Industrial Company, Operating Agency, Board, Board, Sick Industrial Company, Sick Industrial Company, Board, Board, Board, High Court, Civil Court, the Appellate Authority, Board, Court, WB Premises Tenancy Act, Entries, Parliament, Parliament, the Woodland Flat, Parliament, AIJM, Parliament, AIJM, AIJM, Supreme Court, Tata Davy Ltd., Parliament, the Union List, Parliament, Union, Parliament, State, Sales Tax under Entry, the Supreme Court, The State of Uttar Pradesh, B. Vishwanathiah and Company, Union of India, Hills Produce Company Ltd., the Supreme Court, Industrial Company, Industrial (Development and Regulation, Industrial (Development and Regulation, The Supreme Court, Art.254(2, Centre, State, U.P., Parliament, Parliament, the State Legislature, State, Commonwealth, the Commonwealth Court, State, Commonwealth, Supreme Court, Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd., State, the Concurrent List, W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, WB Premises Tenancy Act, WB Premises Tenancy Act, the Supreme Court, Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd, Church of Bouth India Trust Association, the Board of the Appellate Authority, Board, the Appellant Authority, Parliament, Board, the Appellate Authority, Parliament, The Sanctioned Rehabilitation Scheme, inter alia, AIJM, AIJM, Wool Combers of India Limited, Landale & Clark, Woodland Estate, BHR, the Rehabilitation Scheme, the Sick Industrial Company, the WB Premises Tenancy Act, Board, the Operating Agency, Board, District Magistrate, Board, Magistrate, Bombay High Court, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation, Court, Court, Globe Financiers, Khaitan & Co.

CARDINAL: 28.2.1997, 6.2.1997, 2., 8, 4.2.1994, 4.2.1994, 1.4.1991, 3., 29.3.1994, 4.2.1994, 10.5.1994, 7, 9, 7, No.7, 9, 4., No.7, almost one, 4.2.1994, 5., 27.1.1996, 12.6.1996, 7, 11, 6., two, two, One, 8., 9, No.8, 22.8.1996, 31.1.1997, 6.2.1997, 9, 9, 18(8, 26, 32, No.7, 9, 11, 12, 54, 13, 1, 1, one, 1, 3, transferee, 15, One, 2, 1, 16, 2, 2, 2, 17, 18, 19, 1, 20, 21, 7, 13, 55, two, 22, 52, 23, 52, 1956]1SCR393, three, 1, 2, 3, 27, 24, 52, 33, 24, 1991]1SCR305, 52, only one, 52, 1973]1SCR356, 52, 52, 52, 25, 52, 1, one, two, One, 26, 1955]1SCR799, 27, two, three, two, 2, 3, 28, Three, 303:-, 2, 3, three, 29, 1985]154ITR64(SC, two, 31, 1992]2SCR999, 1, 2, 3, 1, 33, 4.2.1994, 4000, 18, 34, 1.4.1991, 35, transferee, transferee, No.7, 2, transferee, transferee, No.7, transferee, transferee, transferee, No.7, No.7, No.7, 36, 40, 275/95, No.1, 8, 9, No.1, 8, 9, 8, 9, 38, 8, 39

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, No.1, No.1, Rs.27,000/-, No.1, No.1, No.1, Vs, Vs, Calcutta, Liquidator

DATE: 27,000/- per month w.e.f, 1.4.1997, a period of, six months, 15.4.1998, December, 1987, about September, 1992, 1985, 1986, 26.5.1994, 14.11.1994, 20.7.1995 third, 120 days, 20.7.1995, No.7, 1956, Rs.10,000/-, a period of, six months, 15.4.1998, 1956, 1956, 31.1.1997, 20.7.1995, 20.7.1995, April, 1991 to March, 1992, December, 1992, 4.6.1992, September, 1992, 44, less than five years, 1951, a period of ninety days, '26, 1956, SICA 1985, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1997)IILLJ989SC, 1985, 1985, 1951, '30, SICA, 1985, 1956, 1956, 1970, 1161, ' 37, 1956

GPE: No.34, No.7, No.7, Woodland, No.7, No.7, No.7, Woodland, Orissa, Karnataka, Tika Ramji's, Kerala, Zeverbhai Amaidas, Bombay, Tika Ramji's, Bihar, the State of West Bengal, No.7, Bombay, I.F.C.I., I.F.C.I., No.7

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first, third, first, first, first

PERCENT: 17.5%, about 83.6%, 83.6%, about 83.6%

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, 2nd Edition, Preamble, the Scheme of Rehabilitation, The Official Liquidator, High Court Bombay, 'Official Liquidator

TIME: the minutes, 65,000/- p.m. 10, the later Act

LOC: West, Ch, Deep Chand Vs, Suit No

FAC: Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia Vs

EVENT: Australian Constitution, the Scheme of the Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //