Shri Vidyanidhi Dalmia Vs. Smt. Nilanjana Dalmia

Decided On : Mar-17-2008

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order 7, Rule 11, the Specific Relief Act, Rule 11, the Specific Relief Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 13, Section 4, Section 4, Section 10, Section 13(1-A, Section 13, Section 9, The Constitution Bench, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 9, Matrimonial Causes Act, Section 15, Section 9, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 9, Section 9, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Domestic Violence Act', Section 17, Section 2(f

PERSON: S. Ravindra Bhat, whatsoever;b, Directors, Directors, Leonara Coster, Coster, Coster, Leonara Coster, Audrey Ann's, Ann, Coster, Fiona Roche, Y.P. Narula, Malvika Rajkotia, Rajkotia, Abdur Rahim, Abdur Rahim, Nanda, Rohini Kumari, Narendra Singh, Kamlekar Shantaram, Chheharta, Kumar Bhargava v. Union, Krishna Kant, Saroj Rani, Earl Jowitt, R.V. Jackson, Mulla, barred.27, Nanda, V Schultz

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Australian, Scottish, Indian

DATE: 1908, 10-5-1978, 1978, 1984, 1990, 1996-2000, the year 2000, January, February, 1999, 1990, 1990-1993, 1995, Later that year, 1993-95, 4th February, 1993, 1994, April, 1996, June 2001, Later that year, 1999, 1000/-, 1963, 1955, less than two years, a period of, two years, the last six decades, 1878, 1950, 1891, 1955, 1953, 2008, 19th February 2008, 1996, approximately 13 years, 7684/2004, four weeks, 1068/2004

ORG: CPC, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Hon'ble Court, Patna, Court, Court, CPC, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Court of Appeal, Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, Court, The High Court, the Court of Appeals, Court, Smt, Act, CPC, State, Mask & Co., Sea Customs Act, Automobiles Ltd., the Supreme Court, Bata Shoe Co. Ltd., City of Jabalpur Corporation, Munshi Ram v. Municipal Committee, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Divorce Court, Law Commission - Seventy-first Report, The High Court, the English Court of Appeals, The Protection of Women, the South Australian Supreme Court, the Domestic Partners Property Act, awarded.33

QUANTITY: 100 metres

GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Mumbai, USA, Dubai, New York, ER, India, so.19, India, Dhulabhai, personem, India, Abdur Rahim, India, Silverstone v. Silverstone, India

ORDINAL: third, first, second

CARDINAL: 12, two, 27, 12, 27, 15/16-5-1996, about two, 25,000/-, 21,000/-, five, 12, one, two, 3, 401.17, 9, 10, 1, 2, one, 1972]2SCR657, 1975)IILLJ445SC, 1977]3SCR182, 1979]118ITR488(SC, 1988]171ITR254(SC, three, 1985]1SCR303, 453, 1, 671, 60, 346, 64, 679, 39, 567, 443, 26, 174, 379, one, Two, one, 1

FAC: Akbar Road, Rajasthan SRTC v.

PRODUCT: Nanda, Nanda 1967, Sections 9 and 10, Para 6.5

TIME: the particular Act, the particular Act

WORK_OF_ART: The Queen v. L 1991