Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vls Finacne Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Commissioner F Income Tax and Anr.

Decided On : Apr-28-2016

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Income Tax Act, the “Act', Section 132, Section 132A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 158BE, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 158BE(1, Section 142(2A, Section 158BE(1, Section 132 of the Act, Explanation 1 to Section 158BE(2, section 142, Explanation 1, the Finance Act, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Explanation 1, Explanation 1 to Section 153 of the Act, Explanation 1 of 158BE, section 153, Explanation 1 to section 153, section 156, section 144, section 143, section 144, Explanation 1 to section 153, Section 142(2A, Section 132(3

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, INCOME TAX & ANR, J.In, High Court, the High Court, CM No.9305/2006, the Block Assessment Proceedings, Block Assessment, Income Tax, Assessing, Income Tax, 5th August, under:“C.W. No.4685/2000 Notice, C.M. No.7227/2000 Notice, Delhi High Court, Income Tax, the High Court, Department, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, 5th August, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Assessing, the High Court, Department, M/s. Ganesh, Vohra, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, Department, the High Court, Block Assessments, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Auto and Metal Engineers, Vs., Union of India, Court, Court, Explanation, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Income Tax Vs, The High Court, the High Court, Court, Warrant of Authorisation, Warrant of Authorisation, the High Court, Department, Court, 5th February, Warrant of Authorisation, High Courts, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, 5th August, 5th August

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, R.D. Jolly, Jolly, Court, Pinky Anand, K.M. Sharma Vs, J.(A.K. SIKRI

GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, NEW DELHI

DATE: 15th December, 2006, 22nd June, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 1998, 1961, 28th June, 1999, April 1, 1988 to 22nd June, 1998, 10th September, 1999, two years, the end of the month, 19th July, 2000, 2000, 29th June, 2000, 10th August, 2000, Year 1998-99, 30th June, 2000, 2 years, 22nd June, 1998, August, 1998, 31st August, 2000, 30th June, 2000, 22nd June, 1998, 1998, two years, 31st August, 2000, 2000, August, 2000, 14th September, 2000, 14th September, 2000, 13th September, 2000, 29th June, 2000, 10th August, 2000, 15th December, 2006, the period between 24th August, 2000, 29th June, 2000, 15th December, 2016, August, 2000, the period between 24th August, 2000 to 15th December, 2006, 30th June, 2000, 2000, December, 2006, two years, 1998, the period between 24th August, 2000 to 15th December, 2006, August, 2000, 29th June, 2000, 31st August, 2000, 30th June, 2000, 31st August, 2000, the last date, 30th June, 2000, the period between 24th August, 2000 to 15th December, 2006, the period of, two years, the day, the day, 24th August, 2000, 2013, 1st June, 2013, 29th June, 2000, 10th August, 2000, the assessment years, March 31, 1972, November 23, 1971, a later date, 22nd June, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 30th June, 2000, 1998, 31st August, 2000, 30th June, 2000, 24th August, 2000, 31st August, 2000, 2007, 22nd June, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 19th June, 1998, 22nd June, 1998, 23rd June, 1998, that day, 1998, 22nd June, 1998, 1998, 1998, 22nd June, 1998, August, 1998, the last date, August, 1998, 2007, 2002, 1998, 1996

TIME: the morning hours

ORDINAL: 5th, 24th, 24th, second, 24th, First, second, third, 5th, 5th, first, 5th, first, 5th, 5th

CARDINAL: 26.07.1999, 29.06.2000, No.2, No.2, No.1, 16, two, 2A, 1, 1, 1, 3, 142, 143, only one, 2, 2016.-.----------------------, 1, 254, 3, 229, 221

EVENT: the Assessment Year 1994-95, Assessment Year 1994-95 to Assessment Year 1996-97

PRODUCT: Rajesh Kumar, Vs, Section 158BE

QUANTITY: 2 SCC181[2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //