Classic Motors Ltd. Vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-13-1996

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 41, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Order 2 Rule 2(3, Order 23 Rules 1, the Contract Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Section 10 of the Contract Act, Section 13 of the Contract Act, Section 14, Section 15, Section 16, Section 17 or, Section 18, Section 15 & 16, the Supplemental Agreement, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, the Supplemental Agreement, Article 14, Article 14, Article 12 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, the Evidence Act, Franchise Practices Act, section 14, Constitution, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, Section 20, Order 2 Rule 2(3, Order 23 Rule 1(3, the Code of Civil Procedure:, Order 2 Rule 2(3, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 23 Rule 1(3, Order 2 Rule 2(3, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, Order 23 Rule 1(3, Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 20, the Arbitration Agreement, Order 23 Rule, Section 39, the Contract Act, Section 39, the Contract Act, Section 39, the Contract Act, Section 39, the Indian Contract Act, Section 39, the Indian Contract Act, Section 10, Section 42, Section 10

PERSON: M.K. Sharma, J., Raj Chopra, Narendra Anand, Raj Chopra, Narender Anand, Raj Chopra, Narender Anand, Raj Chopra, Narender Anand, Madan Bhatia, No.1:-, Arun Jaitley, T.K. Ganju, Kalra, Lalit Bhasin, Statutes, Narender Anand, Raj Chopra, R.C.Bhargava, Raj Chopra, Gandhi Marg, Bhargava, Raj Chopra, Raj Chopra, Raj Chopra, Raj Chopra, Raj Chopra, P.A.Rao, Kool Drinks, E.R. 170, Srilekah Vidyarthi, Shri Narender Anand, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Shri Bhargava, R.C.Bhargava, Sherman, R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Tsang Chuen, Li Po Kwai, Vellappa Gounden v., Panna Lal, Deivayanai Ammal, Chettiar, Bhargava, Frank Marinello, Saghir Ahmed Vs, Gary H.Sharman v., Buckley, Martin Baker Aircrafts v., Llanelly Railway, Llanelly, Srilekah Vidyarthi, Srilekah Vidyarthi, Srilekah Vidyarthi, Lic Vs, lien, Shri Ram Gopal, lien, R.N.Dhanda, Dhanda, Dhanda, P.Nayyar, Nair, Nayyar, Ex, Nayyar, Suresh, A.Then cho, Gypsy Pickup, R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Raj Chopra, Narender Anand, Raj Chopra, R.C.Bhargava, Raj Chopra, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, Shri R.C.Bhargava, R.C.Bhargava, Tamil Nadu, Shri R.C.Bhargava, P.Appa Rao

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4, 9.1.1988, two, 2, 21.TERMINATION, 23.SUPPLY, two, 5, 6, 6.4.1991, 18.11.1991, 18.11.1991, 18.11.1991, 18.8.1994, two, 21, 21, 21, 20.4.1991, 8), 31.8.1994, 9.9.1994, 29.11.1994, 22.11.1994, 9, 29.11.1994, 30.11.1994, 3.2.1995, 31.8.1994, 10, 3.11.1995, 3.2.1995, 11, 1, 2, 15.1.1988, 3, 12, 2, 2, 13, 14, 15, 16, 31.8.1994, 31.8.1994, 6.4.1991, 17, 18, 3, 19, 20, 122, 21, 6.4.1991, 22, 6.4.1991, 31.8.1994, 6.4.1991, 23, 837/92, 3.2.1992, 18.8.1994, two, 20.4.1991, 18.11.1991, 24, 21, 25, 21, 21, 21, 26, 27, 15, 25, 28, 6.4.1991, 29, 1986)IILLJ171SC, 30, 21, 21, 21, 1975]2SCR32, 21, 31, 21, 28, 483, 32, two, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 20,21, 22, 1, 2, 3, 4, 32, two, two, 1978(3, 33, 37, 34, 21, 35, 216, 102, two, 36, 29, 37, 38, 39, 3, 40, 1, 41, two, 43, 21, 55, 47, 48, 1875, 500, 564, 565, 601, 388, 21, two, 50, 51, 91 and 92, 255, 15.1.1988, 55, 2, 32, 3, 3, 21, 22, two, one, 22, 56, 57, 437, 307, 598, 1955]1SCR707, 59, 60, 601, 61, 62, 1973(1, two, 63, 64, 1, 447, 66, 67, 68, 21, 69, 1984]3SCR676, 17, 102, 6.4.1991, 73, 74, 6.4.1991, 75, about 22.2.1991, 490, 490, 1.1.1991, 490, 78, 1, 2273, 770, 31.1.1991, about 500, 90, about 500, 79, 6.8.1991, 81, 4, 3.5.1990, 82, 5, 83, 6, 84, 1,52,894.00, 85, 8, 21, 87, 88, 89, 1975]2SCR32, 90, 1980CriLJ684, 1995CriLJ2107, 1994)6SCC322, 21, 91, 21, 92, 16.11.1994, 22.11.1994, 21, 1, 93, 94, 22, 21, 95, 96, 97, 2, 98

DATE: 1985, the year 1983, 31.3.1986, 1986, 30.9.1986, the 15th day of January, the other 90 days, the other 90 days, 20.1.1988, 1988, 1994, 3.2.1992, 18.11.1991, 18.11.1991, 90 days, 15.9.1994, 26.9.1994, 10014/1994, 1994, that day, the next date, 90 days, 90 days, Para 126, 14.12.1994, Yesterday, Today, 6th April, 1991, 6th April, 1991, 18.11.1991, 3.2.1992, 18.11.1991, the other 90 days, 21, 21, 15.1.1988, 1983, 90 days, 1986, 1986, 1986 to 1991, 21, 90 days, 1991, 1983, 1988, the year 1991, the year 1986, 1991, 21, 1983, the year 1983, about ten years, 1994, 1983, 1979, 1983, 42, the years, 21, 1983, 1988, 44, 45, 21, 21, 21, 46, this week, six months, 2d 429, 1967, 21, 49, 21, 21, 90 days, 15.1.1988, 15.1.1988, 1983, the year 1983, 52, 46, 54, the year 1983, the year 1988, 90 days, 90 days, the other 90 days, 21, 90 days, 21, 90 days, 90 days, 21, 1598, 2nd, 58, 1987, 1928, 21, 90 days, 1995)6SCC566, only 15 days, 15 days, 70, 71, 90 days, 72, 3.2.1992, daily, 1229, 76, daily, 11.3.1991, 28.2.1991, 1229, a quarter, a period of 7 days, 3637, daily, 28.3.1990, 15.12.1990, one month, Para 3, 7 days, six months, 80, 4.3.1991, 11.3.1991, 4.3.1991, 11.5.1990, October, 1990, daily, 86, the year 1983, 15.1.1988, 1974)ILLJ172SC, 1994, 1994, 15.11.1994, 21, the next two, 38

GPE: India, Delhi, New Delhi, I.A., New Delhi, India, India, E.R., London, United States, U.S., New Delhi, India, U.K., U.S.A., U.S.A., England, America, America, India, United States, India, United States, India, U.S.A, Ex, PX-204, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Delhi, Gurgaon

ORG: Union Territory of, M/s. Competent Builders, M/s. Competent Motors, M/s. Competent Motors, Connaught Place and Service Station, Competent Motors, Competent Motors, M/s. Competent Motors, Competent Motors, M/s. Competent Motors, inter alia, Company, Territory, Company, Territory, Territory, M/s. Competent Motors, M/s. Competent Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Classic Motors, Rupees, Court, Suit No.1224-A/1991, Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition (C, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Suit No.2005/1994, the Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition (C) No.15796/1994, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SLP(C) No.4490/1995, 28.2.1995 the Supreme Court, HighCourt, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Classic Motors, the High Court, the Supreme Court's, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition (C) No.15796/1994, the Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition (C, Special Leave to Appeal No, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Classic Motors Pvt, the Supreme Court, Kumari Srilekah Vidyarthi &, U.P.& Others, Central Inland Water Transport Corpn., Brojo Nath Ganguly, the Supreme Court, Lic of India & another Vs, Research Centre & Others, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Application, Court, Unikol Bottlers Ltd., Hyundai Construction Co. Ltd., Unikol Bottlers Ltd., the Supreme Court, Public Prosecutors, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Lic of India (Supra, State, the Supreme Court, State, State, Court, Bharat Petroleum the Allahabad High Court, Shyam Gas Co., The Privy Council, Total Oil G.B.Ltd, P.B.Ghayalod, the Supreme Court, Bihar State Electricity Board Vs, Green Rubber Industries & Others, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Bharathi Knitting Company Vs, Worldwide Express, M/s. Competent Motors, Maruti Udyog Limited, Maruti Udyog Limited, the House of Lords, Llanelly Railway & Dock Company v., London & North Western Railway Co., the Llanelly Railway, North Western Railway Company, the Llanelly Company, the Llanelly Company, British Leyland Motors Ltd., Fed, Canadian Law Journal, United States Supreme Court, Arnold, Schwin & Co.et, State, Competent Motors, Competent Motors, the Privy Council, Palani Gounden &, Nihai Chand, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, R.Thangadurai Nadar Vs, Tamil Nadu Electric Board Vs, Company, Statute, Western Men Inc., Shell Oil Company, the Canadian Court, Shell, Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, Specific Performance, The Supreme Court, U.P., Crown, the American Legal World, The Supreme Court, State Legislations in America, British Leyland Ltd., State Legislation, Hill Oils & Sales Ltd., Gillespie Brothers Ltd., Bench, Doc Co., Credit on Gas Company, Staffordshire Area Health Authority, the Court of Appeal, Hospital, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Liberty Oil Mills, Vs ., Union of India, Liberty Oil Mills, the Supreme Court Along, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, Additional Advocate General, District Government Counsel, the State Government, Escorts Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, State, the Supreme Court, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Amritsar Gas Service & Ors, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition No, Maruti Udyog Limited, Bank of America, Bank, the Bank of America, Bank of America, the Bank of America, Bank of America, the Bank of America, the Income Tax Department, Income Tax, Vyasa Bank, the Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department, Vyasa Bank, Vyasa Bank, Vyasa Bank, Bank, the Income Tax Department, Ambience Chit Fund, 26.2.1991, Maruti, the Supreme Court, M/s. Competent Motors, PW1 & Shri Raj Chopra, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Advocate General, State of Bihar Vs, Madhya Pradesh Khair Industries, Dda Vs, Bloom Dekor Limited Vs, Arvind B.Seth & Ors, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Cpc, Court, No.2 & 3, NO.2 & 3

FAC: Mathura Road

PRODUCT: Agreement, 3.2.1995, No.1, No.1, No.1, Application, Vs, Consent, AlecLobb, Lordship, D-33, No.1, No.1

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 6th, 11th, first, first, third, first, Secondly, first, second, 1986(8)ECC189, first, second, second, second, second, second

WORK_OF_ART: 31.8.1994, 31.8.1994, Pdm Reddy Vs, Franchise', the Sale Policy, Muni Reddy Vs

LOC: North Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd., Central Inland, Atlantic

EVENT: Air 1932, Series, Lrc 468

NORP: Similar, Canadian, American, American, Inspection

LANGUAGE: English, English