Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nalwa Investment Ltd.

Decided On : Feb-06-2009

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 260A, Section 80, Section 139(3, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 139(3, Section 254, Section 254 of the Act, Section 246A, Section 80, Section 139(3, Section 33, Section 254, Section 23 of the 1922 Act, Section 143(3, Section 30, Section 246A, Section 33, Section 254, Section 143(3, Section 246A., Section 139(3, Section 143(3, Section 80, Section 143(3, Section 139(2, Section 80, Section 80, Section 139(3, Section 80, Section 74, Section 139, Section 80, Chapter, Section 139, Section 72, Section 73, Section 74, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 80, Section 33

PERSON: Rajiv Shakdher, J.1, Gopi Lal v. CIT, J.H. Gotla

DATE: 1961, 1705, year 1995-96, year 1994-95, 1994, sixty days, 31-10-1994, 21-11-1994, year 1995-96, 30-8-2000, 1922, 1961, 1961, the year, the subsequent years, the year, the subsequent year, year 1995-96, 1956]29ITR661(SC, 1922

PRODUCT: the 'Act'

CARDINAL: 29, 1704/, 7-11, 1961?(ii, 2, four, four, 500, 500, 500, 111, 389, 31, 23, 100, 19-12-1994, 10, 190, 389, 111, 389, 480/07).4.1, 500, 350, 389, 29-11-1995, 91, 20, 3, 31-3-1997.5.1, 24-3-1998, 111, 111, 5-6-2000, 5-6-2000, 111, 111, 5, 27-10-2000, 5, 27-3-1998, 11,98,000, 111, 13,29,78,000Assessed, 6,27,81,805By, 27-10-2000, one, 22-2-2002, 32, 5-6-2000, 111, 24-3-1998, 1964]54ITR54(Cal, 111, 1,14,98,680, at least 90, 500, one, 500, 389, 111, 5-6-2000, 111, 5, 11,98,000, 111, 13,29,78,000, 24-3-1998, 73(2, 1, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 90, 111, 500, 389, 5-6-2000, 5-6-2000, 111, 5, 91, 5-6-2000, one, 5-6-2000, 111, 1985]156ITR323(SC, 339)14, 665)CIT, 4, 1971]82ITR363(SC, 367)15, 5

ORG: Tribunal, ITA No, Tribunal, Tribunal, Jindal Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., M/s. Abhinandan Investments Ltd., JISCO, JISCO, Secured Redeemable Non-Convertible Debentures, the Securities Exchange Board of India, JISCO, SRNCD, JISCO, JISCO, JISCO, JISCO, DW, JISCO, Unit Trust of India, UTI, JISCO, JISCO, UTI, JISCO, DW, Abhinandan Investment Ltd., ITA No, Abhinandan Investments Ltd., JISCO, UTI, DW, SRNCD, UTI, JISCO, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, NCD, UTI, NCD, Tribunal, Assessing, UTI, Tribunal, Assessing, SRNCD, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, Hon'ble Calcutta High Court, Kooka Sidhwa & Co., CIT, the Appellate Tribunal, Assessing, Appellate, ITO, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Assessing, Tribunal, NCD, Tribunal, NCD, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Assessing, JISCO, JISCO, UTI, JISCO, DW, JISCO, JISCO, Tribunal, Tribunal, UTI, UTI, SRNCD, Tribunal, Tribunal, SRNCD, Assessing, Tribunal, Section 72(1, JISCO, The Tribunal, the Supreme Court, High Courts, The Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, CIT, Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, C. Parakh & Co., Mahalakshmi Textile Mills Ltd., Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Co. Ltd., CIT, Tribunal

MONEY: 34 per cent, 90 per cent, 90 per cent, nearly 40.43 per cent, nearly 18.80 per cent, nearly 24 per cent

GPE: JISCO, JISCO, JISCO, Counsel, Delhi, India, Karachi

NORP: Indian, ITAT, Indian

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //