Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Daya Nand and ors.,

Decided On : May-07-2002

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 2(5, the Industrial Disputes Act, the I.D. Act', Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Section 2(oo, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 53, Section 53(1, Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.30, Section 11A of the I.D. Act, the I.D. Act, Section 11A of the I.D. Act, Rule 38, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 12 of the Constitution and, the Directive Principles in Part IV of the Constitution, the Service Regulations or Rules, Article 14 of Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Rule of Law, Constitution, Regulation 9(b, Article 14 and 19, Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 21, Article 14, Article 14, Article 311 of the Constitution saying:-'6, Article 311, Article 311, Rule 46 of the Pension Rules, Article 311, Rule 10, Rule 10, Article 311 of the Constitution, Section 25, Article 311

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service, Letters Patent Appeals, Court, the Apex Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, DTC, Mazdoor Congress and Ors, Aligarh Muslim University, Punjab & Sind Bank, Hindustan Paper Corporation, Purnendu Chakrobarty, Hari Pada Kahn v. Union of India and Others, J.K. Cotton Spinning, Weaving Mills Company Ltd., State, U.P., Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd., Gujarat Steel, Management, Management, the Industrial Tribunal, the Labour Courts, The Workmen of Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co., India P. Ltd., The Management and Ors, DTC Mazdoor Congress's, Clause 2, Reliance, Syndicate Bank, Syndicate Bank Staff Association, Uptron India Ltd., Parliament, the Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, The Delhi Transport Corporation, the Central Government, Section 53(2)(c, Delhi Road Transport Authority (Conditions of Appointment and Service, Regulations, Authority, the State Administrative Medical Officer, the State Administrative Medical Officer, Authority, DTC Mazdoor Congress's, Authority, Authority, State, Regulations, Management, the Industrial Courts, the Industrial Tribunal, the Labour Court, Court, DTC Mazdoor Congress's, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Court, Court, State, Government Company or Public Corporations, Such Government Company or Public Corporations, State, J., the Apex Court, JMA Industries Ltd., Court, the Apex Court, Clause 2, the State Government, Government, Government, Government, Advocate General, Government, Regulation, Government, Government, Apex Court, Syndicate Bank's, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Tribunal, Aligarh Muslim University's, Registrar/Finance Officer, Registrar, the Executive Ordinance of AMU, Chapter IX of Regulations, the Executive Council, Aligarh Muslim University, Non-Teaching Employees, the Executive Council, the Executive Council, the Aligarh Muslim University, Punjab & Sind Bank's, the Apex Court, Management, The Apex Court, the Indian Oil Corporation, Corporation, Union of India, Court, SLP, Court, Weaving Mills Company's, Gujarat Steel Tubes's, the Apex Court, Court, Court, The Apex Court, These Letters Patent Appeals

DATE: 1952, 2001, 1947, 1973)ILLJ278SC 10, 1998]1SCR719 15, the year 1950, three months, eighteen months, up to eighteen months, up to eighteen months, one year, '21, one month, three/one month's, '22, '23, month, '49, '50, five years, '51, 30 days, '52, three days, three days, 1972, 5 years, less than 5 years, '54, 1972, five years, five years, '56, more than 5 years, 5 years, 5 years, Rule 10(c)..'57, 90 days, the consecutive days, 30 days, 90 or more consecutive days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, '59, 1992, '61

LOC: Single, Single, Single, Single Judge

PERSON: Vinay Sabharwal, justice.8, Mansoor Ali Khan, Sakattar Singh, Sabharwal, Regulations, Sabharwal, Jai Shanker v. State, Deokinandan Prasad, Shammi Bhan, Said, Regulation 14(10)(c, Sabharwal, Sabharwal, Sabharwal, Rule 9(i, Rule 9(i, Rule 37, J., L.M. Sharma, J., K. Ramaswamy, B.C. Ray, J., down.48, Jai Shanker's, Dayandanda, Sabharwal.53, Rule, Clause XVI, Clause XVI, Hari Pada Khan's, held:-'5, Tulsiram Patel, Cotton Spinning, Sri Asoke Sen, Shamsher Singh's

CARDINAL: 1, 214, 1997)IILLJ704SC, 1996)ILLJ1044SC, 1991)ILLJ39SC, two, 1966)IILLJ140SC, 1971)ILLJ557SC, 1952.17, 3, 14, one, 1, 2:-, 9, thereof.(ii, two, one, 38, 9(b, 19, two, 1993)IILLJ696SC, one, 10, 10(c)(i, five, 1972.58, 20, 13-11-1995

MONEY: 1980)ILLJ137SC .9, 1985)IILLJ206SC a Constitution Bench

EVENT: Regulation 9(b, Regulation 15

GPE: Tribunal.12, Rajasthan, reasons.36, fallacious.40, India, D.K., Dayananda, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, held:-'4, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, necessary.62, J.K.

FAC: Delhi Transport

PRODUCT: Regulation 9, terminated.33, Regulation 9(b, Articles 21, Deokinandan Prasad's

WORK_OF_ART: Regulation

ORDINAL: firstly, first, first, second

NORP: Dayandanda

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //