M.R. Tobacco Pvt. Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Apr-20-2004

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 35, Section 35(1, Section 35(1, Section 35, Section 35, Section 35(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 3, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35(1, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 35, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35, Section 128, the Customs Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, The Customs Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 128, the Customs Act, Section 128 of the Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 128, the Customs Act, Section 35, Section 128, the Customs Act, Section 35, the Income-Tax Act, Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Constitution Bench, Section 195(a)(b, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 35(1, all Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 10, Section 12(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 10, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 4 to 24, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 81, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 81, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 3 of the Limitation Act, Section 86, Section 81, Section 81, Section 86, the Limitation Act, Section 81, Section 82, Section 86, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 81, the Limitation Act, Section 82 and Section 117 of the Act, Section 81, Section 6, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 16 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 35, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 35, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 18, Section 18, Section 20, Section 18, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 18, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, Section 18, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Rent Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 18 of the Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the Rent Act, Section 35, Section 29(2, Section 29(2, Section 10, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 34, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act and Section 34, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 34, the Limitation Act, Section 34, the Limitation Act, Section 34, Section 33, Section 34, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 417 of the Code, Section 417, Section 417, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 417, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 417, Section 417, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 417, Section 35(1, Section 5', Section 35(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 35(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 25, Section 25, the Limitation Act, Section 25(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 25 of the Act, the Limitation Act, Section 25(2, Section 35, the Limitation Act

PERSON: Durrez Ahmed, J.1, Pan Masala, Gutkha, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Order XXI, Customs, Ujjam Bai, Jagannath Prasad, Lalji Haridas v. State, Madan Lal Das, Hukumdev Narain Yadav, Lalit Narain Mishra, Mukri Gopalan v. Cheppilat, Lalji Haridas, Gajendragadkar, Das Gupta, Lalji Haridas, Schedule, Mukri Gopalan, Gazette, Schedule, Schedule, Mukri Gopalan's, Parson Tools, Mukri Gopalan, Tools, Mukri Gopalan, Madan Lal Das & Sons, Kaushalya Rani, Gopal Singh, Kishan N. Lal-wani, Tamil Nadu Act.17

CARDINAL: 2404.49, 31.10.2000, 24.04, 27.11.2001, 28.02.2001, 2106.00, 61/02, 28.07.2002, thirty, 27.08.2002, four, 50, 405, thirty, 13.02.2004, 1988(37)ELT478(SC, 30, 641, 1977]1SCR563, 35, 413, 1963]1SCR778, 1963]2SCR850, 12, 13, 14, 14, 1964CriLJ249, 1977]1SCR683, 1974]3SCR31, one, 1, one, 2, 18, 5, 12, 82, 117, 117, 117, 24, 18, thirty, 22, 4 to 24, two, two, 1975]3SCR743, 3, 1976CriLJ179, 396, 8, 8, 3, 4, 3, 4, 1964]4SCR982, 4, 4, 4, 417(4, one, two, 1963.16, 2002]SUPP5SCR522, 2, 2

DATE: 1985, 17.05.2002, 17.05.2002, 1944, ' 35, sixty days', sixty days, sixty days, the sixty days, the sixty days, thirty days', only up to 90 days, thirty days, 94 days, the period of, 30 days, the entire thirty days, 05.06.2003, 30 days, 2003, 30) days, 1963, 1963, 1963, '5, 1908, 1944, 1963, 1963, 1963, the period of, 30 days, 1944, 1963, 1944?7, 9/2003, 1962, 1987, 1963, 1962, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 1962, 1962, 1944, 30 days, 1922, 1963, 1963, 1963, 30) days, 1963, the period of, thirty days, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1944, 1963, excluded.11, 30) day period, 1963, 1963, 1965, thirty days, the thirty days, 1965, 1963, '13, 1963, one year, six months, 1963, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1996, three months, three months, thirty days, that:-'8, 1963, 1963, 1898, sixty days, sixty days, 1963, sixty days, sixty days, 1963, 1908, 1963, sixty days, sixty days, 1963, sixty days, sixty days, 1898, 1963, 1963, 1963, thirty days, 1963, 1960, one month, one month, 1963, one month, 30 days, 1944, 30 days, 30 days

PERCENT: 16%, 24%

ORG: the Central Excise Department, Central, Central Excise, the Commissioner (Appeals, APPEALS, Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Abhishek Auto v., C.C. Mumbai, RLT, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Sections 4 to 24, the High Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, the applicability of Section 5, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, CUS AC, Court, the Supreme Court, Doaba Cooperative Sugar Mills, Mills India Limited, Collector of Customs, ELT, SC, State Transport Appellate, Sales Tax, Parson Tools & Plant, U.P., U.P., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Sales Tax, U.P., UOI, Popular Construction Co., Income-Tax, CJ, the Income-Tax Officer, the Income-Tax Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Supreme Court, Income-Tax, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the U.P. Sales Tax Act, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the U.P. Sales Tax Act, inter alia, The Supreme Court, Hukumdev Narain Yadav, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sections 4, Dictionary, Legislature, Sections 4 to 24 of, Court, Section, Sections 82, Sections, Sections, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, Court, the Supreme Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, The Supreme Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Kerala Rent Act, Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CST, the Supreme Court, Parson Tools, Sales Tax, the Supreme Court, Parson Tools, the applicability of Section 14(2, the Supreme Court, CST, Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Supreme Court, Union of India v. Popular Construction Company, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Sections 4 to 24 of, the Supreme Court, Court, Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., Mangu Ram, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, acquittal.(5), the High Court, The Supreme Court, that:-, the applicability of Section 5, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Mangu Ram, Union of India v Popular Construction, the Supreme Court, India House, the High Court, the High Court, the applicability of Section 5, the Supreme Court, the applicability of Section 5, the High Court, Sections 4 to 24, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal

ORDINAL: first, first, first

GPE: New Delhi, Explanationn, rent.(5, Mangu

NORP: CERTAINCASES.Any, Mohd Ashfaq

FAC: Sections 4 to 24, Sections 4 to 24, the Tamil Nadu Buildings, Tamil Nadu Act, Tamil Nadu Act

PRODUCT: the 'Limitation Act'

EVENT: Limitation Act

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate

MONEY: award.--xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, 1) xxxx xxxx xxxx