Govind Ram and ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-04-1993

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 120B, Section 420, the Indian Penal Code, Section 25 of the Arms Act, Section 5, Section 132, Section 5 of the Tada, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 120-B, Section 420, the Indian Penal Code,Section 25, the Arms Act and Section 132, the Customs Act, Section 19, Section 5, Section 120B, Section 420, the Indian Penal Code, Section 25, the Arms Act and Section 132, the Customs Act, Section 5 of theTADA, Section 5, Section 120Bread, Section 420, the Indian Penal Code, Section 25, the Arms Act, Section 132, the Customs Act

PERSON: Jaspal Singh, Tada, Tada, Habeas Corpus, Tada, Nos, Directors, Clinton Drive, Pragati Maidan, N. Delhi, Fire Arrrs, Tada, Tada, Sanjay Dutt v., Tada, Sanjay Dutt v. State, Tada

DATE: 30/04/1993, 1959, 1987, 20/05/1993, 1850, today, 1993, 1993, 5/05/1993

NORP: Terrorist

ORG: Disruptive Activities, TADA, Customs, Additional Chief MetropolitanMagistrate, the Designated Court, Court, Court, M/s. G.D. Ferrro Alloys, Company, A & A Metals Inc, pistol hammer733, a Ballistics Expert, the Central Forensic ScienceLaboratory, Icd Depot, Arms Manufacturing Company Ruger (USA, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the Supreme Court, Paras Ram v. State, L.J. 416, the Apex Court, the Designated Court, the Supreme Court, Court, First Information Report, the Bombay High Court, The State of Maharashtra, The High Court, the Bombay High Court

GPE: C.B.I, Houston, Texas, USA, U.S.A., Haryana

ORDINAL: First

CARDINAL: 5/12/1992.On, nine, two, 405, 809, 22, 334, 22, 146, 9, 571, 303.'In, 297, 5, 574

WORK_OF_ART: Found