Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Asstt. Cit Vs. Hewlett Packard Ltd.

Decided On : Aug-14-2001

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: section 9, the Income Tax Act, ITD 508, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, article 2, the Income Tax Act, article 4, article 6, article 8, article 12, article 3 of this, article 14, article 14.4, the Income Tax Act, article 6.1, Income Tax Act, article 6, article 3, article 3.1, article 9, article 4, article 5, Article 5.9, article 8.4, Article 14, article 6.1, article 2 of this, Article 3 of this, article 4, article 6, article 2 clause (, article 3, article 2 clause 1(h, article 3, article 2, section 9, section 9, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, section 90, section 90, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act

GPE: Singh, New Delhi, India, Federal Republic of Germany, Germany, Sweden v. Dy, West Germany, SB, India, India, India, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, India, Italy, India, U.K., Germany, India, Delhi, West Germany, India, Federal Republic of Germany, India, Federal Republic of Germany, USA, US, Italy, Explanationn, Explanationn, India, India, US, India, US, India, India, India, India, India, West Germany, US, India, India, India, sectionNew Delhi, US, US, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Explanationn, Netherlands, India, the Federal Republic of West Germany, India, India, U.K., India, India, India, France, India, West Germany, Sweden, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Japan, x(e, Japan, India, India, U.K., India, U.K., India, France, India, India, India, India, Federal Republic of Germany, India, hand.57, India, India, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, India, India

CARDINAL: 4-11-1993, 1,11,33,650, 3, 4, 29, 123, 1, 11, 3 to 44, two, 16, 6.1, 6.1, 29, 30, 53, 36, 51, 1988]172ITR521(Cal, 6, 22, 1983]139ITR806(Guj, 1-4-1972, 47, 1, 46, 1984]148ITR774(KAR, 1991]190ITR626(Cal, 43, 63, 601, 1977]110ITR145(Bom, 1991]190ITR626(Cal, 22, 2.1, 9, 6(i, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 30, 53, 6.2, 56,24,000).23, 22, two, 9(1, two, 13, 1,11,33,650, 1,11,33,650.'26, 6.1, 4, 4.(iv, 6, '4.1, 8.5, 8.5, 8.9, 12, 1, 5, 6(i)(ii, 3, two, 3, 10, 3, 1)(h, 1, 1, 1, 7, 7, 1, 2, 6, 6, 1, two, 28-6-1984, 3, 7, two, 2(v, 17, 48,698, 11, DTAA.55, 332, 125, 126, 14, two

ORG: Appeals)-I, Commissioner (Appeals, DTA, M/s. DCM Ltd., Learned Departmental Representative, the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement, the Commissioner (Appeals, DCM Ltd., ITO, GmbH, Departmental Representative, the Government of India, the Government of India, Ministry of Industry to M/s. HCL Ltd., the Indian Company, the Government of India, the Government of India, Departmental Representative, the Apollo Domain Computers GmbH, DCM, the Apollo Domain Company, the Government of India, DCM Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, ITD 123, ITO v. Automobile Peugeot, ITD 329, CIT, ITD 293, Daimler Benz AG, CIT v. Majestic Auto Ltd., ITD 313, CIT, ITD 97, Bom-Trib, CIT, Ahmedabad Manufacturing & Calico Printing Co., Departmental Representative, DTAA, Bench, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, Reliance, Citizen Watch Co. Ltd., IAC & Ors, CIT v. Davy Eshmore India Ltd., Graphite Vicarb India Ltd., ITO, SB, DCM Ltd., ITO, Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., ITO, Modern Threads, CIT, TTJ, Jp, the Bombay High Court, Aziende Colorinazionali Affini, Calcutta High Court, DTAA, the Calcutta High Court, DTAA, N.V. Phillips, CIT, Tribunal, ITD 47, DTAA, DCM, Departmental Representative, the Government of India, Apollo Domain, Departmental Representative, ITD 293, DCM Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, Departmental Representative, Swadeshi Polytex, Departmental Representative's, M/s, Apollo Domain Computers, M/s. HCL Ltd., DTAA, the Indian Income Tax Act, DTAA, DTAA, M/s. HCL Ltd., the Government of India, Ministry of Industry, Department of Industrial Development, M/s ADC, CAD/CAM, M/s ADC Computers, HCL, HCL, Installments, the Bombay High Court, Aziende Colorinazionali, CIT, the Calcutta High Court, Reliance, the Bombay Tribunal, ITD 87, the Commissioner (Appeals, DTAA, M/s. DCM Ltd., DTAA, DTAA, M/s. ADC, M/s. ADC, DTAA, the Tribunal Delhi Bench, DCM Ltd., ITO, Bombay High Court, DTAA, Tribunal, Bombay Bench, Siemens, ITO, DTAA, M/s. ADC, M/s. HCL Ltd., the Tribunal Delhi, M/s. DCM Ltd., M/s. ADC, Technical Information and Technical, Licensed Products, HCL, HCL, Apollo Software Programs, each Apollo Software Program, Apollo Software Program, Apollo, DOMAIN/IX, Ext, the List of Documentation under, Ext, The Departmental Representative's, Apollo, Apollo, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, HCL, HCL, Apollo, HCL, Industrial Property Rights,, Warranties, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, HCL, HCL, Licensing Software Programs', Software, HCL, HCL, Software Program, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, Apollo, the Reserve Bank of India, Apollo, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, Apollo, Apollo, the Bank of India, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, the Software Programs, Software Program, HCL, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, HCL, HCL, the Software Program, HCL, HCL, Apollo, the Software Programs, Apollo, Third Party Software Programs, Apollo, HCL, Third Party Software Vendors, the Apollo Software Program, Third Party Software Vendors, Apollo, HCL, Third Party, Apollo, HCL, Third Party Software Vendors, Third Party Software, Apollo, Third Party Software, HCL, HCL, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, HCL, Apollo, Departmental Representative, the Government of India Shri S.H. Keshwani, M/s HCL, Apollo Computers Incorporation USA, IndiaMinistry of IndustryDepartment of Industrial DevelopmentSecretariat, M/s Apollo Computer Inc. USA, CAD, Government of India, M/s Apollo Computer Inc., PMP, Sd/(S.H., the Government of India'33, HCL India, the United States Export Licensing Authority, Apollo, Apollo, Technology and Technical Assistance, Ext, C.I.F., HCL, HCL, HCL, HCL, Apollo, Apollo, HCL, Ext, HCL, Ext, HCL, M/s ADC, M/s ADC, M/s ADC, M/s ADC, M/s ADC, M/s ADC, DTAA, DTAA, the Contracting State, the Contracting State, each Contracting State, M/s. ADC, the Bombay High Court, Aziende C.N.A. Italy, the Bombay High Court, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, the Calcutta High Court, N.V. Philips, Tribunal, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, The Commissioner (Appeals, DCM Ltd., ITO, DTAA, DTAA, Learned Departmental Representative, ITO v. Automobile Peugeot, Tribunal, M/s. ADC, DTAA, Learned Departmental Representative, Daimler Benz AG, Atlas Copco AB, CIT, Departmental Representative, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA, necessary.46, Departmental Representative, CIT v. Majestic Auto Ltd., Reliance, the Gujarat High Court, CIT v. Ahmedabad Manufacturing, the Calico Printing Co., the Gujarat High Court, DTAA, the Gujarat High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Gujarat High Court, Tribunal, DCM, DCM, Citizen Watch Co. Ltd., Karnataka High Court, the Government Company, DTAA, the Contracting State, the Government Company, DTAA, Davy Ashmore India Ltd., DTAA, the Reserve Bank, N.V. Phillips v. ITO, Departmental Representative, the Calcutta High Court, DTAA, DTAA, the Calcutta High Court, Davy Ashmore India Ltd., inter alia, the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation, Lordships, RBI, Lordships, N.V. Phillips, M.V. Phillips, the Graphite Bicarb India Ltd., ITO, the Government of India, Installment, the Government of India, the Government of India, Tribunal, DTAA, Swadeshi, Polytex, ITO, Departmental Representative, Swadeshi, Tribunal, DTAA, Departmental Representative, Tribunal, Siemens Aktiengellschaft & Anr, Tribunal, DTAA, Tribunal, Modern Threads Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, DCM, Tribunal, DTAA, Vienna Conversion, TM, the Government of India, Departmental Representative, the Government of India, DTAA, Tribunal, DTAA, DTAA, the Government of India, DTAA, DTAA, DTAA

DATE: year 1989-90,2, 1989, 5 years, 1989, 1995, 1991, 1994, 1987, 1961, 1961, 1992, 1999, 1987, 1989, 1995, 5 years, five years, 5 years, 5 years, 11-5-1987, 1961, 1961, Dec. 1988, 1,11,33,650, 1987, '25, '29, '30, '31, 15 days, the 45 days, daily, 30 days, 30 days, '14.1, 5 years, '32, 20-11-1991M, the second year, a period of, 5 years, another period of 5 years, '35, '37, '40, 10-7-1985, five years, 10 years, 1971, ten years, 10 years, five years, a period of 5 years, 54, 5 years, 5 years, '14

FAC: the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, the Delhi Bench, Explanationn 2 section 9(1)(vi

EVENT: US Dollar, ITD 28, the Bombay Bench, US $, US Dollars 800, the Vienna Convention

PERSON: Nos, Apollo Domain, Apollo Domain, Atlas Copco, ADC, N.V. Phillips, Siemens Aktiengesellschatt v. ITO, Apollo Domain, N.V. Phillips, Swadeshi Polytex, N. V. Philips, List under Ext, Nehru Place, Lump, Subject, Apollo, situated.(7, Lordships, Ltd.56

ORDINAL: first, third, third, third, Third, first, first, firstly, firstly, Secondly, second

NORP: Swadeshi, Indian, German, us.27, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Japanese, Indian, Japanese, Indian, Indian, Italian

PRODUCT: 329, Calcutta, DTAA.44

MONEY: $ 1.1 million, 3,66,500, $ 1.1 million, eight hundred US dollars, 800, seven hundred US dollars, 700, five US Dollars, 5, 3 per cent, 11, 1, 30 per cent, 20 per cent, 50 per cent, 50 per cent, 3 per cent

TIME: normal business hours

QUANTITY: 8.4 HCL

LANGUAGE: English

WORK_OF_ART: VIII(A

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //