Thomson Brandt Vs. the Controller of Patents and Designs

Decided On : Feb-14-1989

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 116, the Patents Act, Section 5, the Patents Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 14, Section 2(i)(j, Section 2(i)(j, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, section 3 of the Act, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 48 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, 1., 0 4 to 15, 2, 3., 4., 5., 6., 6, 8., 2, 2, 1, 1979]2SCR757, more than one, 3, 4, 5, at least one, 6, 267, 8)

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

DATE: 1970, 8th March, 1984, 9th May, 1980, 1970, 133673, 147324, 1957

ORG: Asstt, Controller of Patents & Designs, Controller, IR, IR, Controller, Hindustan Metal Industries, Mangat Ram Choudhary & Ors, Raj Parkash, Chemical, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller

GPE: New Delhi

PERSON: Controller, wherein, wherein, wherein, Shyam, Law, Raj Parkash, Elton, Controller

PERCENT: 90%

WORK_OF_ART: Reading of Section 2(i&j

LOC: Mis

PRODUCT: Controller

LANGUAGE: English