Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State (Delhi Administration) Vs. G.P. Nayyar

Decided On : Nov-27-1973

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 5, Section 161, the Indian Penal Code, Section 5 Which, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 120-B. Indian Penal Code, Section 161, Indian Penal Code and Section 5, Section 5, Section 120-B and Section 161, Indian Penal Code, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Act No. 40 of 1964, Section 5, Section 5, Act No. 16 of 1967, Section 2, Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 6, Section 5 of the 1947 Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5 of the 1947 Act, Section 5, Act No, Section 2 of Act No, Section 5, Article 20 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 20 and/or, Article 14 of the Constitution.8, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Article 13, Constitution, Constitution, Article 13, Constitution, Constitution, Article 20, Constitution, Constitution, Section 5, Article 13, Constitution, Section 5, the Interpretation Act, Section 38, the Interpretation Act, Section 6, the General Clauses Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, the General Clauses Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, the General Clauses Act, Section 5, Article 20 of the Constitution, Article 31, Constitution, Article 20, Constitution, Article 20, Section 2 of Act No, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20 (11, Section 5(3, Section 2 of Act No, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Article 20, Article 20, Constitution, Section 5, Article 1, Section 10, the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Constitution, Article 20, Article 20, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Constitutional, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20, ' Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 6, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Article 20, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Act No. 40, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Article 20, Section 5, Article 20, Article 14, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Article 14, Article 14, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20, Constitution, Section 5, Section 5, Article 20, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 20, Constitution, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, Act No, Article 14, Section 33 of the Payment of Bonus Act, Section 2

ORG: V.S. Deshpande, Parliament, ER 403, Parliament, The Prevention of Corruption Act, or(d, Legislature, Court, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, inter alia, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Siraj, Rehman, Siraj, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Parliament, Sub-Section, the Anti-Corruption Laws (Amendment) Act, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sub-Section, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Tindal, C, Tindal, Tindal, Tindal, Parliament, Tindal, East End Dwellings Co. Ltd., Finsbury Borough Council, Nayyar, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Legislature, Legislature, Shri Garg, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Calder v. Bull, the U.S. Supreme Court, State, Chase, State, the Supreme Court, Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh, American Constitutions', Court, Siraj, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Shri Garg, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Learned Counsel, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, Counsel, Sub-Section, Court, C.S.D. Swamy v. The State, Sub-Section, the High Court, Sub-Section, Court, Court, R.S. Pandit, State of Bihar, LJ, R.S. Pandit's, Sub-Sections, Sub-Section, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh's, Court, Court, Shri Garg, Legislature, Shri Garg, the Supreme Court, Jalan Trading Co., P.) Ltd., Court, the Supreme Court, Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh's, report.there, the Anti-Corruption Laws (Amendment) Act

NORP: J.1, British, English, English, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: 'Law as Fact', the Common Law in

PERSON: De Lolme, Kay v. Goodwin, 6 Bing, G. P. Nayyar, Rehman, G. P. Nayyar, G. P. Nayyar, G. P. Nayyar, G. P. Nayyar, G. P. Nayyar, Shri R. L. Mehta, Counsel, Nayyar, Nayyar, Nayyar, Shri R. K. Garg, Shri Garg, Nayyar, Keshavan Madhava Menon, Law, Shri Garg, C. J., Keshavan Madhava Menon's, C. J., Common Law, Statutes, C. J., Asquith, Pandurang Vinayak, Teja Singh, Shri Garg, G. P. Nayyar, Law Ed 648, Law Ed 648, John A. Cummings v., Law Ed 356, Charles F. Kring v. State, Law Ed 506, Nayyar, Rehman, Nayyar, Shri Garg, Shri Garg, Nayyar, Shri Garg, Nayyar, D. Swami, Counsel, Shri Garg, Supp, Shri Garg, Mill Mazdoor Sabha, G. P. Nayyar

DATE: 1830, 1947, 1964, 18th December, 1947, 22nd July 1959, 27th July 1959, 1947, 26th December, 1963, 19th January, 1967, 1st July, 1955 to 30th April, 1961, 18th December., 1964, 1947, 11th April, 1967, 1967, 28th June, 1967, 1947, 1964, 1964, 1947, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 18th December, 1964, 1947, 1964, between 1955 and 1961, 18th December, 1964 ', 18th December, 1964, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1889, 1889, earlier in the year 1868, 18th December, 1964, 1939, 1951, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1947, 18th December, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1967, 18th December, 1964, 18th December 1964, 18th December 1964, 1947, 1798, 1798, 1867, 1883, 1947, 18th December, 1964, 1960CriLJ131, 18th December, 1964, 1947, 1960CriLJ131, 1947, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1963, 1964, 1967, before 18th ., December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1203, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 20th June, 1967, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 17th December, 1964, 17th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December., 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 18th December, 1964, 1965, 18th December, 1964, 18th December., 1964, 1967, 18th December, 1964

CARDINAL: 130, 576, 1, 1, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, four, 1, 1, 1964.4, 3, 3, one, one, 6000, 2, 1, 33, 588.34, two, 2, 1, 3, 3, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3).(2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3).The, 3, 2, 3, 1964.7, 3, two, 1, 1, 3, 3, two, 1, 3, 1, 1951CriLJ680, 1, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1951CriLJ680, 3, One, 2, 1959]35ITR408(SC, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1, 3, 3, 3, 1964.12, 1, 1, 1963]2SCR747, 1, 1, 16, 1967.13, 3, 3, two, 1, 16, 3, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, four, 2, 1, 18, 27, 3, 1954CriLJ1480, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 1, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1961CriLJ730, 2, 1, 3, 3, 2, 975, 976, 977, 1, one, four, 2, 3, 3, 1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3).This, 3, 3, 1, 1964.18, 1961CriLJ730, 2, 652, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 661, 3, 1, 2, 3, 666, 3, 1, two, 3, 1, 3, 1954CriLJ1480, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 16, 3, 3, 1964.(3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 1).The, 3, 1).21, 3, 1, 3, 1, one, 2, 5, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1964.(2, 1, 2, 1, two, 2, 1, one, 1, 3, two, two, two, two, 1954CriLJ1480, 3

GPE: Clauses, Clauses, Bombay, Mahajan, England, England, India, Bombay, Missouri, Missouri, the United States, The U. S, C. S, Singh v. State of, Clauses, C.R. Bansi, offence.(5, Clauses

ORDINAL: first, fifth, firstly, secondly, second, Firstly, secondly, first, Firstly, second, first, first, Firstly, Secondly

LANGUAGE: English, English

EVENT: the English Interpretation Act, the Missouri Constitution

LOC: Madras

TIME: the impugned Act No.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //