Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rama Devi and anr. Vs. Delhi Administration

Decided On : Dec-04-1985

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 306, Section 34, Section 227, Section 228, Section 228, Section 227.'It, Section 107 IPC, Section 113A, the Evidence Act, Section 498A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 113-A of the Evidence Act, Section 107 IPC, Section 113A, Section 113A of Evidence Act, Sections 45 to 51, the Evidence Act, Section 161 Cr, Section 306, Section 34 IPC

PERSON: G.R. Luthra, Misc, Ram Pershad Sharma, Ram Kishan, Raghbir, Rama Devi, Ram Kishan, Daya Wati, Naraini Devi, Sukhbir Singh, Daulat Ram, Raghbir, Criminal Misc, Raghbir, Sukhbir Singh, Daulat Ram, Daya Wati, Rai, Ram Pershad, Raghbir, Naraini Devi, Sukhbir Singh, Raghbir, Raghbir, Ram Kishan, Raghbir, Ram Pershad, Raghbir, Ram Pershad, Raghbir, Raghbir, Ram Kishan, Leela, Rajinder Singh, Ram Pershad, same.10, Criminal Law, Rama Devi, Ram Kishan, Ram Pershad Sharma, Ram Kishan, Ram Pershad Sharma, Raghbir Singh, Pershad Sharma, Ram Kishan, Raghbir Singh, Ram Kishan, Rama Devi, Naraini Devi, Ram Kishan, Ram Pershad Sharma, Ram Kishan, Rama Devi, Ram Kishan, Rama Devi.20, Ram Pershad Sharma, Sita Ram, Ram Pershad Sharma, Ram Kishan, Rama Devi, Raghbir Singh, Naraini Devi, Daulat, Sukhbir, Ram Kishan, Rama Devi.22, Ram Pershad, Naraini Devi, Sukhbir Singh, Raghbir Singh, Ram Pershad Sharma, Raghbir Singh, Raghbir Singh, Ram Kishan, Smt, Rama Devi, Criminal Misc, Naraini Devi, Sukhbir, Ram Kishan Smt, Daya Wati, Criminal Misc

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: Two, 108, 994, 108, 7.45, one, 108, four, 994, 1985.4, one, one, one, two, two, two, 71, two, 994, 108, 994, two, 108, 994

ORG: Crl, Crl, Criminal Revision No, IPC, Smt, Promila, Promila, Raghbir, District Sonepat, Criminal Revision, Smt, Smt, Promila, Promila, Promila, Raghbir, Promila, Promila, Daulat Ram, Raghbir, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Hindu Rao Hospital Ram Pershad, Hindu Rao Hospital, Promila, Chemical, Promila, the Supreme Court, Court, under:'A, Section 498A IPC, the Supreme Court, Section 306 IPC, Smt, Criminal Revision No, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Sections 45 to 51 of the Evidence Act, Ram Pershad Sharma, Promila, Ram Pershad Sharma, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Dayawati, Promila, Promila, Dayawati, Promila, Promila, Dayawati, Ram Pershad Sharma, Promila, Smt, Dayawati, Daulat Ram, Promila, Promila, Promila, Promila, Daulat, Additional Sessions, Smt

DATE: 1985, 1985, 1985, April 18, 1985, the same day, January 15, 1984, About five years ago, 1985, follow:'Nearly six months, about two years, about two years, daily, About 15 days, three days, ten years, '13, 1983, 25th December 1983, a period of, seven years, 45 of 1860).'14, a period of, seven years, 1983, '16, seven years, two years, two years, two years, 1985, October 1978, 1985, 1985, 1985, 1985

GPE: Trinagar, Delhi, Sonepat, Explanationn, Explanationn, Promila, Sukhbir, Daulat, Delhi, Smt, Dayawati, Dayawati, Dayawati, Promila, Promila, Dayawati, Dayawati, Dayawati

TIME: about 7.45 p.m.

ORDINAL: First, first, Second, First, first, 4th

FAC: Sawan Park Extension

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //