Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central), New Delhi Vs. Bharat Nidhi Ltd.
Decided On : Oct-05-1981
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 273(a, Section 215(1, Chapter XVII-B (Section 199 to 206, Chapter XVII-C, Section 207, the Finance Act, Section 215(1, section 194A, section 195, the Finance Act, Section 215, Section 192 to 194, Section 215, Section 215
PERSON: S. Ranganathan, Wadhera
CARDINAL: 1, 8, 13,95,256, 22,500, two, 2, 3, two, two, 219, One, less than seventy-five, 192, 194, seventy-five, less than, seventy-five, 4, 195, 192, 195, 5, one, two, 6, 1973]88ITR192(SC, 7, 2
ORG: State, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Income tax Authorities, Appellate Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Income-Tax Act, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Vide, the Supreme Court, Kanga & Palkivala
DATE: the calendar year 1966, 1,34,068, 1961, 1961, 1961, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, the current year's, the earlier year, any financial year, the year, the 1st day of April, the financial year, the financial year, '75, 194A, the financial year, the assessment year, the financial year, the previous year, the financial year, the year, the financial year
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, First
MONEY: 25 per cent, 10 per cent, 25 per cent, 25 per cent, 75 per cent, nine per cent, 10 per cent, 10 per cent, 75 per cent, 75 cent, 25 per cent, 25 per cent, only 75 per cent, 10 per cent, 75 per cent
PERCENT: 75 percent
GPE: Tilis, West Bengal-1
WORK_OF_ART: 7th Edition