Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Drilling and Industries Ltd.
Decided On : Feb-22-2008
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 115J, Section 115J, Section 263, Section 115J, Section 263, Section 115J, Section 115J, Section 350, the Companies Act, Section 263, Section 115J, Section 263, Section 263, Section 115J, Section 260A, Section 263, Section 263
PERSON: Madan B. Lokur, Delhi Bench ', Madras
NORP: J.1
DATE: 1st February, 2006, the Assessment Year 1989-90.2, 18th March, 1991, 1961, 29th November, 1991, 15th January, 1992, 1956, 16th March, 1990-91, that year, the assessment year 1990-91, an earlier year, year 1989-90, the year, 15th January, 1992, 16th March, 1992, the assessment year 1990-91, the assessment year 1990-91, 31st January, 1995, the assessment year 1989-90.11, 27th December, year 1989-90, 27th December, 2000, year 1989-90, that day, year 1990-91.13, 31st July, 2002, the assessment year 1990-91, the earlier year, 18th March, 1991, 15th November, 1992, the subsequent year, the subsequent year's, an earlier assessment year, year 1989-90
ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Assessing, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, CIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal on, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax v. Geo Industries, the Madras High Court, the City Civil Court, Geo Industries, Tribunal, Assessing
PRODUCT: F
CARDINAL: 1992.7, 41,14,955/-, 41,14,955/-, 41,14,955/-, 200, 41,14,955/-, 1998]234ITR541(Mad
ORDINAL: second
GPE: merits.16