K.C. Sud Vs. S.C. Gudimani

Decided On : Feb-13-1981

Court : Delhi

LAW: Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 39A of the Constitution of India, Constitution, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 24, Rule 51 of Chap, Rule 11

PERSON: M.L. Jain, J., S. C. Gudimani, Shri Mathur, K. C. Sud, Sud, Shri Mathur, Rex, L. J. 322, Sardar Surinder Singh v. Comrade, Ram Piara, Surinder Singh Kairon, Shri S. Pratap Singh Kairon, K. L. Misra, Hon'ble V. Bhargava, Hon'ble M. H. Beg, J., Advocate- General, Shri Mathur, Addl, Shri Sital A. K. Dar, Shri Balraj Trikha, Shri R. B. Datar, Queen-Empress, Murarji Gokuldas, Atmaram Mahadeo Ghosale, Malavil Kottavil, Koyassan Kutty, L. J. 329, Gulli Bhagat, Narain Singh, L. J. R. 446, Delay, Efficient Judicature, Joel Gerstl, Glenn Jacobs, Jaws, Donald J. Newman, Ed, Henry J. Drinker, immoralitie'.(7, Patrick Devlin, Ed, Regina, Puddick, 2 K. B. 62.INIndia, Addl, Subhash Chander, Chandigarh Admn, Roop K. Shorey, A. Mohambaram v. M. A. Jayavelu, Kanta Kathuria, Shanti Bai, H. R. Deb, Ed, N. Delhi, Shri I. U. Khan, Shri Teja Singh Sodhi 4, Shri Mathur, Shri Dar, M. D. Sigamani v. Vidyasagaran, S. 321, Ratanshah Kavasji, Koki Behramsha, L. J. 434, Surjit Singh, Shri Dartook, S. Naganna, Krishna Murthy, Addl, Henry Elnner Barnes, Negley K. Teeters, Ed, Shri Mathur

CARDINAL: six, 420, 422, 425, 34, only four, 421, 422, 425, 50, 1965(2, one, three, 13, 389, 18, 25, 1, 2, one, one, one, 3, 251, 5.7, 2, 207-209, one, 118, only two or three, six, 20-23, 4, 97, 90, 2(d, 2(r, one, 25, 302, 26, 225, 474, 377, 378, 1957CriLJ567, 1980CriLJ324, 1970]2SCR835, 15, 15, 1968]3SCR614, 2, 353, one, 5, 1980,IN, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, 22-12-77, 1, 2, 2500.00, 46, two, more than one, 3, 16, 241, One, 1, three, 2)It, 401, 403

ORG: the Metropolitan Magistrate, Kumari Naresh Parmar, Shri Dinesh Chand Mathur, Metropolitan Magistrate, S. 34, Kumari Naresh Parmar, the Public Prosecutor, the Delhi Administration, the High Court, State, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, District Magistrate, Uttar Pradesh, Kairons, the High Court of Allahabad, Advocate-General, Supreme Court, State Govt, the State of Punjab, U.P., State, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, State, Additional Public Prosecutor, Public Prosecutor, Administration, the Additional Public Prosecutors, Additional Public Prosecutor, State, State, Administration, State, the Delhi Administration, the Delhi High Court Bar Association, the Bar Council of India, the Delhi Administration, Shri D. C. Mathur, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Royal Commission, Time, Suffice, Criminal Justice, State, State, Legal Ethics, Connecticut Statute, Crown, Crown, Treasury, The Criminal Prosecution in, Rex v. Banks, State, the Public Prosecutor, the High Court, the High Court(B)for the District, Additional Public Prosecutors, the District Magistrate, the Sessions Judge;(C)Special Public Prosecutor, State, the Central Government, the District Magistrate, The Public Prosecutor, the High Court, a Public Prosecutor (Ss, the-State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh Pandey, the Public Prosecutor, State, State, the Public Prosecutor, State, Govt, Smt, Mahadeo, the Supreme Court, the Railway Administration, Great Western Railway Company, the Public Prosecutor, the High Court, the Joint Committee, the High Court, the Law Commission, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Public Prosecutor, Treasury, Some State Government, State, Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd., Customs, Black's Law, Dictionary, the Public Prosecutor, State, the High Court, the Delhi High Court, Public Prosecutor/Additional Public Prosecutors, the High Court, Standing Counsel, Standing Counsel (Criminal, Public Prosecutor and Additional Public Prosecutors, the Public Prosecutor, naib court, the Additional Public Prosecutors, The Public Prosecutor, the High Court, the Administration to Shri Mathur, the Additional Public Prosecutors, Administration, State, the Bar Council of India Rules, State, State, the Commissioner of Police, Additional Public Prosecutor, Government, Additional Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, State of Punjab v., the Bar Council of India Rules, A.P.P., State, Additional Public Prosecutor, State, State, the Public Prosecutor, State, State, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, State, State, State, State, New Horizons, follows:(1)The Public Prosecutor, the Additional Public Prosecutors, State, State, State, the Delhi Administration, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, State, Kumari Parmar, Shri Mathur.(18

GPE: New Delhi, Vakalatnama, Bisheshar, India, I.L.R., State.(5, Art, U.S.A., pp, pp, U.S.A., London, England, pp, U. K., U.S.A., Delhi, Delhi, Gulati, Delhi.(16

DATE: February 21, 1980, 120B, 421, May 15, 1980, 120B, August 20, 1980, 1949, 1161, January 20, centuries, 1889, 1917, 1924, 1980]1SCR759, 1704, each year, 1966, 1865, 1916, 1973, 1922, 1973, 1972, annual, 1183, April 14, 1973, 1945

NORP: Punjab, Indian

ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, first

PRODUCT: Report, Mundrika Prasad Sinha'

LOC: the Central Govt, the Central Govt

WORK_OF_ART: Prosecuting Officers