Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kulvinder Singh Sethi Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank

Decided On : Sep-28-1999

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 12, Section 19 the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Rule 14, Rule 14, Circular, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14

NORP: J.1, P-1, Scale-III, Randhir, Rules

ORG: Sind Bank, Corporation, the Banking Companies (Acquisition, Middle Management Grade Scale II, Middle Management Grade Scale III, the Union of the petitioner, Sind Bank Officers Union (Registered, Sind Bank Officers Federation', Bank, Test - 40% marks4, Branch, Disciplinary Authority, Federation, Federation, Federation, Branch, HO, Marks, Disciplinary Authority, Federation, Scale IV, III, Zonal Office, Scale-I, Government, Supreme Court, State of Mysore Vs, Reliance, Supreme Court, Principal/DEO/Asstt, Education, the Recruitment Rules, the Supreme Court, Government, the High Court, Special Service, the Special Service, State, the Special Service, the High Court, the Special Service, Union, the Union of the, Zonal Offices/Head Office, Zonal Offices/Head Office, the Union of the, the Union of the petitioner, Association, All India PSB, Branch Office, Branch, The Branch Managers, Officers Federation, the Union of the, Federation, Federation, Reliance, Supreme Court, Reserve Bank of India Vs, Bank, All India Reserve Bank Employees Association, All India Reserve Bank Employees Federation, Hyderabad, Court, Reliance, Union of India and Others, Reserve Bank of India, Others v. Union of India and Others, Officers Federation, Union of the petitioner and, Circular, the Union of the, Promotion, Union of the, Managers, Zonal Offices/Head Offices, Confidential Report, the Union of the, Zonal Offices/Head Offices, Confidential Report, Confidential Report, Zonal Offices/Head Offices, Zonal Offices/Head Offices, Branch, The Management of the Bank, Branch Managers, Bank, the Head Office, Zonal Office, Branch, Head Office, Zonal Office, Controlling Office, Group, State, Supreme Court, Legislature, Union of India, AIR1992SC1, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, State, Supreme Court, State of Uttar Pradesh Vs, Supreme Court, Court, Indian Administrative Service, Supreme Court, Union of India, Government of India Presses, Branch Managers, Bank, Bank, Zonal Office/Head Office, Federation, Union, apex court, Union of India, Supreme Court, Air, Air Marshall, the Air Force, the Navigation Stream, Flying Branch, Court, the Indian Air Force, the Navigation Stream, the Air Force, the Indian Air Force, Supreme Court, The Jalgaon Municipal Council, Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, PWD, Court, Special Service

CARDINAL: 1, 17, 2., One, three, One, one, One or half, 6, 6.4, 14, 21, 6.4, 6.4, 6.4, 8, one, only half, 6.4, two, 9, about 800, II, one, 1/2, one, one, 10, 6.4, 1, 6.4, 2, 6.4, 6.4, 3, two, 4, two, 5, 6.4, 6, 6.4, II, 11, 1968)IILLJ830SC, 12, 7, II, 1996)9SCC178, two, two, 15, 6.4, 16, 6.4, two, 17, one, 1, 6.4, 2, 6.4, 3, 6.4, 1986)IILLJ316SC, 1980)IILLJ182SC, 1997)ILLJ419SC, 4, 6.4, 19, 7/98, 20, 6.4, four, 6.4, 21, one, 22, two, one, 24, one, one, 25, two, 26, one, 14, 1989)ILLJ309aSC, two, 1992CriLJ1091, 20:80, 29, 6.4, one, one, 30, 31, 6.4, 34, 6.4, 35, one, two, 36, 6.4, 38

DATE: 1980, 1982, 21st April, 1999, 21st April, 1999, 21st April, 1999, 21st April, each year, 3 years, 6 months, less than one year'.5, 2550, 14th June, 1999, 2nd June, 1999, 21st April, 1999, each year, '4', 3 years, 6 months, less than one year, 15, 19, each year, years, years, each year, each year, each completed year, eight years, each year, five years, each completed year, 1973)ILLJ42SC, '13, 1994)IILLJ527SC, December, 1998, five years, 21st November, 1998, 21st April, 1999, the day, each completed year, 3 years, up to 3 years, '18, 18th December, 1998, each year, each year, 3 years, up to three years, each year, three years, '32, 21st April, 1999

WORK_OF_ART: Punjab and Sind Bank Officers Services Regulation, All India Punjab and, Confidential Report -

PERSON: Scale III, Branch, Branch, Rajiv Nayyar, Scale III, Banks, Rajiv Nayyar, Rajiv Nayyar, Rajiv Nayyar, Sant Ram Sharma Vs, Rajasthan, M.H. Krishna Murthy, Sunita Sharma, Rajiv Nayyar, Ram Raj Ram Vs, Ram, P.P. Rao, P.P. Rao, Scale III, Petitioner, Branch, P.P. Rao, C.N. Sahasranaman, Rajiv Nayyar, Branch, Rash Behari Sarkar, Art 14, J.P. Chaorasia, Jagannatha Shetty, O. Chinnappa Reddy, J., Marshall, G.B. Mahajan, Sant Ram Sharma, Sunita Sharma, M.H. Krishana Murthy, Ram Raj Ram

PERCENT: 60%, 40%, more than 28%, 60%, 60% to 50%, 10%

TIME: Minutes

MONEY: 10 marks One, 10 marks, five marks, one mark or, four marks, five marks, three marks, three marks, twenty marks, 10 marks, 3 marks, 20 marks, 10 marks, 10 marks, ten marks

EVENT: Scale II, Scale II, Scale II, Scale II, Scale II, Scale-II, Scale II, Scale-II, Scale II

PRODUCT: Scale II, Para 6.4, Para 6.4, Scale II, Scale III, Scale II, Scale, Scale II, Scale II, Scale-II, Scale-II, Scale II, Grade II ', Vs

GPE: H.O, India, Scale, H.O., Z.D., India, Singh, District Judges, Grade I, Judges

QUANTITY: 6.4 - MARKS

FAC: Scale II, Mohan Kumar Singhania Vs

LOC: Policy, Policy, Executive, Jagnnath Vs

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //