Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Azad Bharat Finance Co.

Decided On : Jan-29-1969

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 28(1)(c, Section 66(1, Section 28(1)(c, I.T.R 98, Section 28, Section 28(1)(c, Section 28(1)(c, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28

PERSON: Kapur, Lal Singh, Pishorilal, Faqir Chand, income.4, Faqir Chand, Kirpal, Bajaj, Kirpal, Lal Chand Gopal Das v. Commissioner of Income, Haji Abdul Rahman, Abdul Qayum v. Commissioner, Moman Ram Ram Kumari v. Commissioner, Lal Ghana's, Haji Abdul Rahman's, Ram Ram, Lal Chand's, Bajaj, Gokuldas Harivall-abhdas, Chagla C. J. held, Bajaj.as, Gokuldas, Anwar Ali, Gokuldas Harivallabhdas, L.H. Vora, Vora, Gokuldas Harivallkbhdas's, Bajaj

DATE: year 1952-53, (previous year ending March 31, 1952, the subsequent year, the year, November, 1951, 19th July, 1962, a year, the next year, 1922, 1922, 1960, 1958, the assessment year, '12, therelevant year

ORG: the United Commercial Bank, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, the Bombay High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Chagla C.J., The Calcutta High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Imay, Tribunal, Tribunal, Iwill

CARDINAL: three, 10,000, 10,000, one, two, three, 2, 30,000, 20,000, 6, 1963]48ITR324(All, 1965]56ITR172(All, 1966]59ITR135(All, 1963]48ITR324(All, 1965]56ITR172(All, 59, 135, 1963]48ITR324(All, 34, 104, 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 1958|, 1, 2, 11, two, 1965]56ITR126(Guj, 13, 2., 3, 4, 14, 1963]48ITR324(All

FAC: Gobind Singh

GPE: Faqir Chand, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Lal Chand's, Explanationn, Explanationn, Faqir Chand's

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Explanationnwas

ORDINAL: First, Secondly