Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Diamond Publications Vs. Hind Pustak Bhawan

Decided On : Apr-04-1983

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Copyright Act

PERSON: M.L. Jain, J., Hind Pustak Bhandar, Pustak Bhandar, Diamond, Rapidex, Rapidex, Addl, Zamindara Engineering, Jetmull Bhojraj, Rpg 635

CARDINAL: 1, 23, 6 to 8, between 73 to 83, two, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, seven, five, 8), 9, 10, 11, 416, 2, 24, 3, two, 4, 1, 2, 5, 6, two, one, 1970]2SCR222, 1972]3SCR193, two, One, four, two, one, two, 8)

ORG: the Hind Pustak Bhawan, Pustak Mahal, Diamond Publications, Pustak Mahal, the Trade and Merchandize Marks Act, Diamond Publications, Diamond, Diamond, Hornby Ltd, The Stale of Bihar, Colgate-Palmolive Ltd., K.F. Pattron, Rapidex

DATE: April, 1976, 1976, 1957, December, 1977, 1958, the last two years or so, the years 1982, The same year, 23-12-1982, 1932, 1978

WORK_OF_ART: Rapidex', English Speaking Gowk, 50th Edition, English Speaking Course, English Speaking Course

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

NORP: Chapters, Rapidax

GPE: Hindi, Rustan, Magenta

ORDINAL: first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //