Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ram Parshad Vs. Employee States' Insurance Corporation

Decided On : May-13-1988

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Esi Act, Section 2(9, Section 74, Section 75 of the Act, Section 75, Section 75, Section 75, Section 74

PERSON: D.P. Wahdwa, J., Foundry Works, Masodkar

CARDINAL: 1, 2, more than eighteen, twenty, 2, 4, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, three, 2, 3, 2, 3, 6, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1968]3SCR662, eighteen, 3, 8)

ORDINAL: second, first, first, second

ORG: Employees State, M/s Delhi Steel, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Employees State Insurance Corporation, Corporation, District Collector, the District Collection Officer, Corporation, the Employees State Insurance Act, Corporation, Chapter-VI, State, Employees' Insurance Court Section 75, Employees' Insurance Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, Madhya Pradesh and Am, the Supreme Court, Suffice, the Employees' Insurance Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, the High Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, the Employees' Insurance Court, Employees' Insurance Court, the Bombay High Court, Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. M/s, R.P. Gundu

DATE: 1984, 1983, I.C. 1634

GPE: Delhi, Dhulabhai

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //