Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Taylor Instrument Co. (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Apr-22-1992

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: section 80J, section 80, section 217, section 34, section 32(1)(ii, section 32(1)(ii, the Finance Act, section 32(1)(ii, section 32, section 32(1)(ii, section 32(1)(ii, Section 32, section 80J, section 253, section 80, section 80, section 217 of the Act, section 217, section 217, section 139, section 215, section 215, section 217, section 217 of the Act, section 217 of the Act, section 144, section 144, section 144 of the Act, section 144, section 144, section 84, section 84, section 84, Constitution, section 217, section 80J, section 80, section 80, section 80, section 80, Section 80, Section 80, section 80H, section 80H, Section 80B(7, section 80, section 80-I., section 80, section 80, section 80-I. Before

PERSON: B.N. Kirpal, Bishamber Lal, Rajendra, Mahabir Parshad, Mahabir Parshad, Bishamber Lal, Addl, Rajendra, Gurjargravures, Gurjargravures, Gurjargravures, Benches, Kanpur Coal Syndicate, Gurjargravures, Bench, Bench, Gurjargravures, Rai Kumar Srimal v., suo motu, Rajendra, Manji Dana v., Questions Nos, Bishamber Lal, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble, American, American, American, Indian, Indian, American

DATE: the assessment years 1968-69, 1969-70, 1961, the assessment year 1968-69, the assessment year 1968-69, '1, 1961, the previous year 1967-68, the assessment year 1968-69, 1961, the current year, 1961, January 29, 1973, 1961, the assessment year 1968-69, 1968-69, '32, the previous year, February 28, 1975, the previous year, 1967-68, the assessment year, the assessment year, 1967-68, that year, subsequent years, 1961, the year, 1966, April 1, 1966, the year, the first years, one year, the year, the future years, one year, the year, the year 1968-69, that year, the year 1968-69, the year 1967-68, the subsequent year, the year 1967-68, the year 1967-68, the year, 1968-69, this year, the year, the subsequent year, the current year, the year, 1961, January 29, 1973, January 29, 1973, the assessment year 1968-69, 1963, 1963, '11, 1963, the assessment year 1974-75, 1964]53ITR225(SC, 1964]53ITR225(SC, 0044/1991, 0044/1991, the assessment year 1968-69, 1963, 1963, 1963, 0044/1991, the assessment year 1968-69, 1969-70, this year, '1, 1961, 1961, the current year, 1961, 1961, the previous year, the assessment year 1968-69, 1969-70, 3, 4, the assessment year 1968-69, 1,25,602, 1,25,602, 1,25,602, the year 1969-70, the earlier year, 4, the year 1969-70, the year 1968-69, the assessment years 1968-69

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Assessing, Legislature, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Lohia Machines Ltd., Union of India, the Supreme Court, Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Gujarat High Court, the Allahabad High Court, CIT v. Sharma Construction Co., the Allahabad High Court, Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, A.S.S.S.S. Chandrasekaran, CIT, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, CIT, Sons, CIT, Sons, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, National Products v., The Supreme Court, ITB, Appellate, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Appellate Tribunal) Rules, ITR, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, Gurjargravures P. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, The High Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal) Rules, the Supreme Court, Bench, Jute Corporation of India Ltd., CIT 0044/1991, Appellate, the Supreme Court, Kedarnath Jute Mfg, Co. Ltd., CIT, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Appellate, The High Court, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, CIT, CIT, McMillan and Co., CIT, Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry, ITR, Appellate, The Supreme Court, Kanpur Coal Syndicate's, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Jute Corporation's, the Calcutta High Court, Appellate, the Supreme Court, Jute Corporation's, Appellate Tribunal) Rules, Tribunal, State, State, Appellate Tribunal) Rules, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal) Rules, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Jute Corporation's, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Central Provinces Manganese Ore's, Tribunal, Tribunal, Taylor Instrument Company, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, the Central Government, inter alia, Legislature, Ashok Motor Ltd., CIT, CIT, Standard Motor Products of India Ltd., the Madras High Court

MONEY: 256(1, 100 per cent, 30 per cent, 100 per cent, only 30 per cent, 100 per cent, 100 per cent, eight per cent

CARDINAL: six, 22,750, 2, 253, 254, 3, 5, 6, 1, five thousand, 22,750, 750, 22,750, 1, 750, 750, two, 750, two, 1, 22,750, 2, 253, 254, 254, 1985]152ITR308(SC, 2, 3, 1978]113ITR84(SC, 1975]100ITR603(Guj, 1977]107ITR533(All, 1975]101ITR621(All, Two, 1974]96ITR711(Mad, 1980]125ITR165(Delhi, 1980]125ITR165(Delhi, 1986]160ITR961(SC, 1977]108ITR935(KAR, 946, 968, 160, 1986]160ITR961(SC, 5, 6, two, 11, 49, 66, 11, 1978]111ITR1(SC, two, 111, 1, 1978]111ITR1(SC, 1978]111ITR1(SC, 11, 1991]187ITR688(SC, 1971]82ITR363(SC, 1978]111ITR1(SC, 1958]33ITR182(SC, 1962]44ITR891(SC, 693, 187, 1978]111ITR1(SC, two, three, 1978]111ITR1(SC, 1991]187ITR688(SC, 1976]102ITR525(Cal, 1991]187ITR688(SC, 11, 29, 29, 11, 1991]187ITR688(SC, 1966]60ITR582(SC, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1986]160ITR961(SC, 5, 6, Five, 253, 254, 2, 1,25,602 3, 4, 22,750, 1, 5, 2, One, 31,50,735, 3,81,150, 1, 2, fifty thousand, 3, 1, 80, 1961]41ITR397(Mad, 1962]46ITR814(Mad, 2, 1, 2, 3, 5, 3, 1, 6, 1 and 3, 2, 4, 5

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly, secondly, first, second, first, first, fourth, second, first, first, first, first, second

GPE: India, Bros., India, India, India, India, India

PERCENT: 100 percent, 80-I. Deduction

LOC: Vidyapat Singhania v.

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //