Shiv Shanker Lal Gupta Khandelwal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii, and Tohers.

Decided On : Mar-14-1967

Court : Delhi

LAW: article 226 of the Constitution of India, article 226 of the constitution of, section 132, section 132, article 226 of the Constitution restraining, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, Constitution, section 132, section 132, article 226, article 226, section 132, a Central Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Marriage Act, Order 27A, the Civil Procedure Code, article 132, Constitution, article 132, Constitution, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132A, section 132, Constitution, section 132A., section 132, section 132

PERSON: K. S. HEGDE C.J. -, Nos, Sharma, Order, Sharma, Sharma, Syed Hussain Ali v. Durgah Committee, Sharma, Sharma, Sharma, Sharma, Sharma

CARDINAL: 1,17,000, 5, 5, 11, 5, 5, 11, 12, 14, 1, 31, 1, 1,17,000, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 5, 1, 1, 147, 2, 1, 147, 1, 1, 2, 31, 1963.&quto;These, 75, 11, 11, 11, one, 4, 5, 5, 5, 250.Petition

MONEY: 6 per cent

DATE: the 9th July, 1966, the 6th October, 1966, 1961, 1961, 1961, 1961, 19, July 9 and 11, 1966, 1961, 1961, 1961

GPE: India, Bombay, Bombay, the City of, Bombay, the City of, Bombay, India, so.&quto;The, New Delhi, Delhi, Bombay

ORDINAL: second, second, third, second, First, first, second, first, second, first, first, third, third, third, third, first, third, third

ORG: and(h, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Government of India, the Central Government, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidate Fund of India, the Central Government, the central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Advocate-General of the State, State, &quto;the, the Central Government, State Government, the Advocate-General of the State, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the Allahabad High Court, Swadeshi Ctoton Mills Co. Ltd., Sales Tax Officer, the State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the U. P. Taxation Laws Amendment Act, the Rajasthan High Court, Bapna, the Union of India, the Central Government, the Advocate-General, the Union Government, the State Government, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Supreme Court, Collector of Customs v., East India Commercial Co. Ltd., the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, Government

FAC: Bombay City II