Orient Cartons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Jun-07-1996

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: the IT Act, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, Chapter XX-C, the Motor Vehicle Act, the Motor Vehicle Act, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, Chapter XX-C, Chapter, the IT Act, Chapter XX, Chapter XX-C.24, Chapter XX-C. We, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, the WT Act, Chapter XX-C.Under, Chapter, the IT Act, the IT Act

CARDINAL: 1, 34,08,275, 50, 1961.2, two, two, 30-3-1992, 134, 57 to 70, 5(five, 50, 5(five, forty one thousand and one, 1, forty one thousand, 2., 3., 37, 4, 16,60,000, two, two, 50, 52,21,000Less, 7,88,738Premises, 28,470New, 8, 1, 1992.10, 50, One, 12, 14, 201, 216, 15, half, 17, two, 50, 50, 27, 22, 19, 22, 54.19, 46, one, 20, almost three, 121, two, 21, 6, 32, 163, 166, 259, transferee, 175, 50, 213, 443, transferee, 191, 307, only two, 50, two, 82, 32, two, 32, 2, 32, 127, 169, 334, 167, 32, two, 50

DATE: 7th June, 1995, 1992-93, the financial year, Feb., 1992, 1407, 21 days, 1961, 30th March, 1992, Feb., 1992, only 13th May, 1992, the year, 1992-93, the assessee before 31st March, 1992, 31st March, 1992, the financial year 1991-92, four months, before 31st March, two years, 1993, 1995, a period of, two years, a period of, two years, under s. 54, the accounting year, 1987, 1987, one year, one year, under s. 54, s. 54, 45, 1993, November or December of the financial year, 1980, 1987, 1987, four months, the next financial year, 1989, 1995, 1991, 1961, Feb., 1992, 30th March, 1992, 1971, the year, the year, the subsequent year, the subsequent year, 1961, 1981, 1988, 1988, the accounting year

ORG: inter alia, WDV, Prasad Mrs., the Prasad Chambers Premises Co-op, Society Ltd., Prasad Chambers, Vendor, Vendors, AO, WDV, 57,01,001, AO, AO, AO, AO, WDV, CIT, CIT, the Bombay High Court, Tribunal, Rajaram, ITO, TTJ, ITD 141, Tribunal, Bombay Bench ', Smt., Shilavati Agarwal, Fifth ITO, ITD 230 (Bom, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, SC, Court, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, CIT, Tamil Nadu Agro Industries, CIT (, Departmental Representative, the Central Government, the Allahabad High Court, Shailendra Kumar, Union of India, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Rajasthan Patrika Ltd., Union of India, the Transfer of Property Act, Appropriate Authority, Tanvi Trading and Credits, SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, SC, Departmental Representative, the Commentary of Sampath Iyenger, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Parthas Trust, CIT, the Hon'ble Kerala High Court, the Hon'ble Kerala High Court, Court, the Central Government

LOC: premises

PERSON: Ramesh D. Shah, Chitralekha P. Shah, A. C., Shri Ramesh D. Shah, Dilipsingh Sardarsingh Bagga, Hilla J. B. Wadia, Dilipsingh Sardarsingh Bagga, Hilla J. B. Wadia, Hyderabad Bench, Addl, Surat Art Silk, Dilipsingh Sardarsingh Bagga, Golcha Properties, Hilla J. B. Wadia, Hilla J. B. Wadia, R. B. Jodha Mal Kuthiala, R. B. Jodha Mal Kuthiala, U. P. State, means.33, R. B. Jodha Mal Kuthiala, Osman Ali Khan, CWT

ORDINAL: 24th, 14th, 24th

PRODUCT: 269UC, 269UK, 269UK, 376, 269UC, 269UC, 888

GPE: Bombay, Expln, Pakistan

FAC: question.23

NORP: s.50

WORK_OF_ART: Eighth Edition, Vol