R. Dalmia Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi

Decided On : Jul-12-1971

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 2(6C)(iii, section 2(6C)(iii, section 2(6C, the Companies Act, section 2(6C, Section 2(6C, Section 2(6C, section 2(6C, Section 2(6C)(iii, Section 2(6C)(iii, Section 20(i, the Finance Act, Section 3 of the Finance Act, Section 2, Section 20, Section 20(2, Section 20, Section 20(4, the Finance Act, Section 2(6C)(iii, Section 2(6C)(iii, section 7, section 22, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Summary Jurisdiction Acts, Section 341, the Merchant Shipping Act, Section 341, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Act 36 of 1956, section 22, Section 167(8, Section 167(8, Section 4A(b, section 4A(b, section 2, section 17, Section 2(6C)(iii, section 2, Section 2(24)(iv, Section 2(6C)(iii

PERSON: Hardayal Hardy, Delhi Bench, Shri R. Dalmia, Allen Berry, Allen Berry, Allen Berry, Alien Berry, C. W. Harrison, Earl, Morris, Howden, Bruce J., James Craven, Cook, E. W. Craven, Greene M. R., K. T. Morris, Madras, T. S. Veiikataswami Naida, Radha Kishan Bhalia, Gandalal, includes--, deemed a. person

ORG: Court, Bharat Union Agencies P. Ltd., Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, Appellate, Appellate, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, Yogiraj Charity Trust, Briguraj Charity Trust, Appellate, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, Tribunal, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal, the House of Lords, William Cory & Son Ltd., A.C. 274, BUTwhen, Court, Batts Combe Quarry Limited, Ford, the Court of Appeal, Batts Combe, Batts Combe, Chelms Combe, Batts Combe, sec, New India Motors, the Labour Appellate Tribunal, The Union of India, the Sea Customs Act, S. 167(8, S. 167, Tribunal, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, the Supreme Court, Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, un, Tribunal, THEquestion, the Bharat Union Agencies Private Limited, Legislature

CARDINAL: 66(1, 53,398.00, 1922'(2, 30-19-1954, 3, 53,398.00, 1800, 5000, 4, 4406.00, 5, 6, 1-4-1955, two, 8), two-fold, two, two, 9, 10, 11, two, less than, two, less than, 12, 13, 1800, 5000, 53398.00, 14, 4406.00, 15, 4406.00, 16, 17, 1-10-1953, 30, 3 to 19, 6C, 3, 18, two, less than, less than, 1800, 5000, 20, 21, 33A, 22, 23, 24, 1897(1, 378, 26, about 91, 27, 28, One, three, 29, 30, 33A, 1960)ILLJ551SC, 31, two, 32, 1965CriLJ154, 8), 33, 1800, 5000, 40, 1, 34, 24, 2, 3, two, 41, 2(6C, 37, 300.00

DATE: 1922, 1955-56, The previous year ended, the previous year, the previous year, 1922, previous year, 1922, 1922, the companies year, year, the previous year, 1955, 1922, years, the accounting years, 1955, year 1955-56, 1950, the period of, 30 days, 1947, 1878, Section 167(8, 1906, several years, 1894, 22 1, 22 1, 1943(l)Ch.51, ten years, ten years, 1947, 1947, 1950, 1878, 1922, the day to day, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1922, 36

PERCENT: more than 20%, 100%

ORDINAL: first, first, firstly, secondly, second, second, second, first, first, first, secondly

GPE: Sections, India, Great Britain, Halsbury L. C., Sheffield, the British Islands, Canada, Liverpool, Quebec, Liverpool, Quebec, Bombay City v.

LOC: the Sea Customs Act, the Isle of Man, Europe, the Mediterranean Sea'

PRODUCT: Bench

NORP: 341st, Hindu

QUANTITY: 75 miles

MONEY: 1959)IILLJ622Mad P. V. Rajamannar C.J., 33 per cent