Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income-tax Officer Vs. Purshottam Lal Roongata Family

Decided On : May-21-1996

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

LAW: Section 24, Section 24, Section 24 accordingly.4, Section 24, Section 255(2).7, Section 23, Section 24, Section 23 of the Act, Section 24, Section 24, Section 23(l)(a, Section 23(1, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24(l)(ix, Section 24(1, Section 24, Section 22, Section 23, Section 23, Section 23, Section 23, Section 23(1, Section 23, Section 23(1)(b, Section 23(1, Section 23, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24(1)(ix, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 24(1)(x, Section 24, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Rule 4, Section 24(1

CARDINAL: 1, two, 0.33, 0.55, 1,96,581, 69,158, 65,527, 2, 8, 1,31,053, 65,527, three, 42,474, 13, 65,527, 5, 37, 1,96,581, 1,96,581, 65,527, 1,31,159, 13, 13, 65,527, 6, 1,96,581, 1,31,053, 3, 8, 60,000, 122, 12, 131, 435, 1,31,053, 1,96,581, 179, 7, 392, 65,527, 194, 124, 39, 4, 209, 987.16, 1,31,053, 1,96,581, 4, 22, 23, 22, 23, 1, 22, 131, 131, 152, 0.33, 0.55, 0.55, 14,892.5, two, 29,785, 16,381.75, 1,96,581, 1,31,054, 1,96,581, 1,96,581, 65,527, 1,96,581, 1,31,054, 65,527, 13, 4, 4, 28, 1,96,581, 1,96,581, two, 1,96,581, 65,527, 1,31,054, two, 1,96,581, 1,31,054, 65,527, 1,96,581, 1,96,581, 7, 179, 7, two, 32,763, 1,31,054, 1,96,581.34, two, 24, 35, 24, 1)(x, 37, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4, 65,527, 1,96,581, 65,527

PERSON: Purshottam Lal Roongata Family Welfare Trust, Lekh Raj Channa v. ITO, Shri Ranka, Rai Kapoor, Shri Ranka, Shri Ranka, Lal Roongata, Amolak Ram Khosla, Balbir Singh

DATE: the year 1977, the assessment year 1988-89, July 2, 1988, four months (June, 1987, January, 1988, February, 1988, March, 1988, 16,381,70 per month, December 27, 1988, the financial year 1987-88, September 4, 1991, annual, 1961, June 12, 1995, 1990, previous year, 1961, annual, the year 1977, the previous year, year 1988-89, annual, 1950, 6, annual, 1980, 1981, annual, year, the year, the preceding year, annual, that year, annual, the year, 1989, annual, 1984, annual, 1961, annual, the months of July, 1987, January, February, March, 1988, 1992, 1980, 1994, the previous year, annual, annual, annual, year, annual, 1975, annual, year, 1981, 1981, 1985, annual, 1961, 1975, the assessment year 1976-77, annual, 1975, annual, annual, 1)(a, annual, annual, February 2, 1985, February 5, 1985, 6 and 5, July 3, 1984, July 4, 1984, July 3, 1987, the previous year, March 31, 1988, 12 months, annual, annual, annual, annual, the assessment year 1976-77, annual, previous year, previous year, a year, a period of, 15 days, monthly, the months of June, 1987, January, February, March, 1988, four months, four months, annual, annual, previous year, annual, 1984, 1989, 1961, annual, annual, 1984, annual, monthly, annual, year, annual, annual, annual, 1961, the year, annual, annual, the year, the year, the entire previous year, four months, such months, annual, the previous year, one year, a subsequent year, the year, that year, annual

ORG: the Food Corporation of India, FCI, FCI, the FCI Committee, FCI, FCI, Assessing, the Commissioner of Income-tax (, FCI, Clauses 4, Tribunal, FCI, Tribunal, TTJ, Bench, Departmental Representative, FCI, Departmental Representative, FCI, FCI, the High Power Committee, Departmental Representative, Departmental, Departmental representative.10, Assessing, FCI, FCI, Corporation, FCI, Clauses 4, FCI, The Food Corporation of India, Clauses 4, FCI, FCI, Committee, Bench, the Controller of Rents, FCI, the Controller of Rent, New Delhi Municipal Committee, SC, the Supreme Court, Sheila Kaushish, ITR, Haryana High Court, CIT, Reliance, Bombay Bench, Tribunal, Verma Family Trust v., ITO, FCI, the Bombay High Court, Panalal Silk Mills P. Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, Mahamudabad Properties P. Ltd., CIT, FCI, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Dunlop India Ltd., Bench, FCI, Department, rent.18, the Departmental Representative, FCI, Departmental Representative, Departmental, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Sheila Kaushish, SC, SC, SC, the Rent Control Act, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, the Supreme Court, the Rent Control Acts, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI.However, FCI, Clauses 4, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, Committee, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, Verma Family Trust, P &amp, Verma Family Trust, FCI, Corporation, Legislature, FCI, FCI, Legislature, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI, FCI

GPE: Rajasthan, Jaipur, damages.19, Clause, conditions.33

FAC: the Delhi Bench, the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction, Prakash Chand, Prakash Chand Sushil

PRODUCT: 297

NORP: Punjab

ORDINAL: Sixth, Firstly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //