Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

J. K. Synthetics Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : Apr-24-1981

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 36, Section 36 of the Act, Item 18, Item 18, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 47, Section 4 of the Act, Rule 9, the Excise Act, Central Excise Act, Section 36 of the Act, section 75

PERSON: S. Ranganathan, Shri Sohan Lal Singhania, Kota, Yarn, Yarn, Rs 2,05,62,824.96, Kota, Yarn, Collector, Sri Ravinder Narain, Sri Ravinder Narain, Keshardeo Morarka v., B. D. Barucha v., Hoystead, Abdul Cafoor, App Cas 584, App Cas, App Cas 551, Radcliffe, Cafoor, Brij Lal Lohri &, Broken Hill, Cafoor, Snoath, Raja Bahadur Visheshwara Singh, Kesardas Morarka, M. M. Ipoh, Chandrachud J., Karsendas Ranchoddas, Radcliffe, Sankaralinga Nader, N. A. Shah, Hire Lal, Vasant Lal, Hira Lal, Nagpur, al Tribunals, H. A. Shah, Tendolkar, Seth Ramnath Daga v., Kaniram Ganpat Rai v., Pat, Sri Ravinder Narain

NORP: J.1, Rules, Central Excise, Subbayya, Heystead, R. D. Aggarwal

ORG: M/s. J.K. Synthetics Limited, the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, the Assistant Collector and, the Collector of Central Excise, the Collector of Central Excise, Nylon Yarn, Kota, Kota, Chemical, Caprolactam, Rayon, Synthetic Fibres, Rayon, Denier, Denier Group Rate, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Central Government, the Central Excises & Salt Act, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Excise Tariff, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Government, the Central Government, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, Central Excise Rules, Central Excise Rules, the Central Board of Central Excise, Customs, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Central Board of Central Excise, the Central Board, the Central Government, the Central Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Collector of Central Excise, the Assistant Collector and the Collector, the Central Government, the Central Government Order, the Central Government Order, the Central Government Order, Court, the Central Government, The Central Government, the Government of India, Rules 9 & 9A, Tariff, the Central Government, Bharat Carpets Ltd., Union of India (Suit No, ELT, Bharat Carpets Ltd., the Union of India, the Union of India, Government, the Union of India, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Union of India, the Union of India, CIT, CIT, Installment Supply, P) Ltd. &, Union of India and Others, Government, Department, the Privy Council, Broken Hill, Society of Medical Officers of, Tribunal, a Board of Review, Broken Hill, the High Court of, the Privy Council, Committee, the High Court, Board of Review, the Board of Review, Supreme Court, the Board of Review, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, New Jahangir Vakil Mills Co. Ltd., CIT, CIT, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, British India', CIT, ITR, CIT, The Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, Dalhousie Investment Trust Co., CIT, ITR, Investment Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Supreme Court, the High Court, Supreme Court, a High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, Courts, the High Court, the Judicial Committee, Broken Hill, Broken Hill Municipal Council, App Cas94 P.C., Court, Court, Co., CIT, Shah & Co., Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Sankaralinga Nadar, the High Court, Tribunal, the Madras Full Bench, Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Chagla C.J., Burmah Shell Refineries Ltd., Chand, the Bombay High Court, Shah & Co., CIT/E.P.I., Kotrika Ramaswamy Chetty, the Punjab High Court, CIT, Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd., Co., Chagla C.J., Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, CIT, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, Supreme Court, Tribunal, CIT, ITR, Tejmat Bhojing v. CIT (, the Central Government, Department, Department, the High Court, Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court

DATE: 3rd March, 1973, 6th March, 1973, 9th March, 1973, 6th March, 1973, '18, 36-80 33.50(iii, 1968, 1968, 6th/7th August, 1968, September, 1968, 25th October, 1969, 11th May, 1970, 1944, 26th May, 1972, 26th May, 1972, May 64 to 16th June, 1972, years 1970 and, 1971, January 1972 to 16th June, 1972, May 1964 to December, 1969, 3rd March, 1973, 25th October, 1969, 11th May, 1970 earlier, 6th March, 1973, 9th March, 1973, 3rd March, 1973 earlier, 9th March, 1973, 1944, 22nd February, 1973, 3rd March, 1973, 21st March, 1974, 22nd February, 1973, 3rd March, 1973, 6th March, 1973, 9th March, 1973, May 1964, up to 16th June, 1972, 20th March, 1973, 3rd March, 1973, 20-4-1973, 26th May, 1972, May 1964 to June 1972, the earlier years, 2nd February 1978, 1978, 22nd June, 1968 to 20th April, 1972, 14th April, 1972, 14th April, 1972, 1926, 1961, 1960, one year's, another year, the year, a subsequent year, a previous year, that year, a different year, that year, the years 1950-51, the year 1949-50, one year, another year, an earlier year, a subsequent year, the year, 1932 - 17, the following year, an earlier assessment year, a subsequent year, the year, future years, 1961 42, year, a previous year, previous year, the assessment year 1949-50, 1968]67ITR106(SC, one year, 1968 68, 1970, one year, another year, year, earlier years, years, a subsequent year, the earlier year, As early as 1930, 1926, 1926, every year, year, year 1941-42, years 1942-43 to 1944-45, years, 1941-42, each year, the subsequent year, '19, the later assessment years, an earlier year, year 1955-56, year 1955-56, year 1955-56, a particular year, that year, an earlier year, a subsequent year, 1955-56, 1941, 3 32, an earlier year, the earlier year, an earlier year, an earlier year, 1972, 26th May, 1972, 26th May, 1972, 1980, 1972, 26th May, 1972, a period of, three months, three months, 16th June, 1972, 6th March, 1973, March, 1973, 9th March, 1973, 3 months, 19.9.1974

CARDINAL: two, 2, Two, 2, 2, 18, 81, 28.50(iv, 111, 151, 5.85, 4., 2, 152, 180, 200, 36.80, 81, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 18, 18A, 188, 13, 69.84, 9(1, 2, two, 3., 9(1, 4., only one, 2, only one, 9(1, one, 68, 68, 4, 7, 18, 12, 142/73, 111, 7,31,153.08, 7,31,153.08, 7,31,153.08, 14,381.06, 1962]44ITR529(SC, 1963]49ITR135(Bom, 1962]2SCR644, 94, one, 597, 1963]49ITR137(SC, 1972]84ITR273(SC, one, 149, 1951]19ITR168(SC, 685, 1962]44ITR529(SC, 487, 1972]83ITR256(Bom, only one, 53, two, one, 17, one, two, 18, 1956]30ITR618(Bom, 13-12-1939, one, 193, 149, one, one, one, one, two, 1966]61ITR493(Bom, 1967]64ITR388(AP, one, 27, 1971]82ITR287(Bom, 9, 21, 2, one, two, 68, 66, 68, 68, 500.25, 20-4-1973, 68, 20-4-1973, 29, 4, 68, 68, 68, 68, 4.8.1975, 20.4.1973

GPE: Explanationn, Explanationn, England, P.C., H.L., Australia, India, India, Chagla, Patna, p.a.

ORDINAL: 5th, 7th, first, first, 2nd, first, first, second, second, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, second, second, first, first, first, 3rd

LOC: Superintendent, Madras

WORK_OF_ART: the Collector of Central Excise

TIME: 81,84,365.86

PERCENT: 12%, 12%

LANGUAGE: English

PRODUCT: App Cas 155, Chettiar, The Full Bench

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //