Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Feb-03-1970

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Wealth- tax Act, the Indian Companies Act, Section 5(1)(xvi, Section 35, Section 3 of the Act, Section 2(q, Section 3, Section 2(m, section 6, the Estate Duty Act, the Expenditure-tax Act, Section 2(m, Section 2(m, section 2, the Collector of Excise, a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court, Section 2(m, section 5

PERSON: H.R. Khanna, Gift, Lindley L. J., Madras, Jagadisan J., Beg JJ

CARDINAL: 1, 8, 1, two, 8, 1, two, 8, 6,13,614.00, 1, 23,98,742.00, 3, 4, 6,13,614.00, 23,98,742.00, 5, 1, 586, 6, 6,13,614.00, 6,13,614.00, 8, 23,98,742.00, 8), two, 9, 10, 6,13,614.00, 23,98,742.00, 1966]59ITR767(SC, One, 11, One, 12, 1963]50ITR495(Mad, 1967]63ITR356(All, 27,167.00, 14, 6,13,614.00, 23.98.742.00, 15, 8, 1, 2,000.00, 2,000.00, 16, 1, 8

ORG: Wealth Tax References No, the Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd., Wealth Tax Reference No, Pakistan Savings Certificate, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Pakistan Savings Certificate, the Indian National Savings Certificate, Appellate, Tribunal, National Savings Certificate, National Savings Certificate, the High Court, Appellate, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal on behalf, The Tribunal on September 30, 1967, the Appellate Tribunal, Cotton Mills Ltd., Parliament, the Central Board of Revenue, the Central Government, THEliability, Government, Devi Das Madho Prasad v., Income-Tax, U.P., the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, National Savings Certificates, Pakistan Savings Certificates, Indian National Savings Certificates, Pakistan Savings Certificates

DATE: 1968, 1969, 1968, year 1957-58, June 30, 1956, 1969, year 1958-59, June 30, 1957, 1968, 1957, 27 of 1957, the assessment year 1957-58, 1957, 2.000.00, 1957, 1969, the assessment year 1958-59, 1957, the assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, April 10, 1958, October 12, 1962, 1963, 1957-58, February 28, 1958, March 17, 1959, January 5, 1967, April 10, 1958, 2.000.00, the assessment year 1958-59, November 29, 1958, November 27, 1961, April 10, 1958, years 1957-58, 1958-59, January 5, 1967, the assessment year 1957-58, the year 1958-59, the assessment year 1958-59, every assessment year, the first day of April, 1957, the previous year, that year, 1953, 1957, more than twelve months, 1883, Q.B.D. 518, the year ending March 31, 1957, that year, March 31, 1957, 1922, the accounting year ending March 31, 1957', March 31, 1957, December 9, 1954, the assessment year 1955-56, April 10, 1958, October 12, 1962, the past period, 1968, 1968, 1969, 1968

GPE: Delhi, India, Pakistan, Pakistan, India, Pakistan, Webb v. Stenton, Manchanda, Refence No, Pakistan, Refence No

MONEY: 2(m, 2(m, 2(m, 2(m

ORDINAL: second, second, Second, second, first, second

NORP: Indian, Hindu

PRODUCT: Schedule, Kesoram

LOC: Praesenti

WORK_OF_ART: The King Match Factory

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //