Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The New Bank of India Ltd. Vs. the Income Tax Officer and ors.

Decided On : Aug-02-1979

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: section 148(1, section 147, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, article 226, article 226, the Constitution Bench, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, section 148(1, section 148(1, section 148(1, section 148(2, section 148(1, section 148(1, section 148(2, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, section 147, section 148(1, section 148(2, section 147, section 148(1, section 148(2, section 148(1, section 139(2, section 139(1, section 139(2, section 148(1, section 139(2, section 148(1, section 139(2, Article 226 of the Constitution, section 148(1, section 147, Article 226, section 147, section 148(1, section 148(1, section 139(2, section 148(2, section 147, section 147, Article 226.(16, section 147, Article 226, section 256 of the Act, section 148(2, section 147, Article 226 the Court, Article 226 of the Constitution, section 153(2, section 151, section 147, Article 226, article 226 of the Constitution and, Article 226, section 147, Article 226, section 147, Article 226, Article 226, section 147, section 147, section 119 of the Act, section 119, section 119 of the Act, section 119 of the Act, Article 74 of the Constitution the, Article 77(3, section 18(2A, section 34, section 149, section 149

ORG: V.S. Deshpande, the High Court, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the High Courts, the House of Lords in Anisminic Ltd., the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Gee Vec Enterprise, this High Court, the Supreme Court, S. Narayanappa & Others, the Supreme Court, A. Raman & Company, THE High Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Kantamani Venkata Narayana & Sons, the Supreme Court, THE High Court, Calcutta Discount Company's, The High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, Bunbury, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Calcutta Discount Company's, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, -Barium Chemicals Limited, Rohtas Industries Limited, S. D. Agarwal, Chemical Company Limited v. Company Law Board, Calcutta Discount Company, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Delhi Development Authority, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, High Courts, Timing of, Judicial Review', the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Assistant Appellate Commissioners, COPY, CIT/D. l/B-2/(103)j77-78, Income Tax, the I.A.C. Range-IIA, the Ministry of Law, Suspense Account, Bank, the Central Board of Direct, the Commissioners of Income-tax, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Board, State Bank of Travancore, the High Court, the Law Ministry, The Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, Board, the Kerala High Court, the Ministry of Law, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Kerala High Court, the Ministry of Law, the Kerala High Court, the Ministry of Law, Board, Board, Board, the Commissioners of Income-tax, Board, Reliance, the Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, the Supreme Court, the High Court, High Courts, the Ministry of Law, 7th Edn, Board, the Ministry of Law, Board, the Council of Ministers, the Government of India, the Ministry of Law, The Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Ministry of Law, Board, Government, the Ministry of Law, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, U.P., the Wealthier-tax Act, Jai Hanuman Trading Co., Government

DATE: 1961, 1976, 1978, 1961, 1969, 1975, 53, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1967]63ITR638(SC, the respective year, 1853, the year 1973-74, 31st March, 1978, today, the assessment year 1973-74, 1973-74, 1973, 1952, 1st April, 1975, 1977, 33606, 1973-1974, the year 1973-74, 31st March, 1978, March, 1978, 1969]72ITR376(SC, 32, 31st March, 1978, the year 1973-74, 31st March, 1978, four years, 1975]99ITR581(SC, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1961, four years, the 31st March, 1978, year, about 20 years, 1924 to 1978

CARDINAL: 3, 3, 2, 3, two, 60, 415, 1961]43ITR387(SC, 4, 2, 147, 67, 6, One, 1967]63ITR219(SC, 8), 1968]67ITR11(SC, 226, 226, two, 147, 148, 9, 111, 71, 1888)21, 313, 11, 1)If, 2, 3, 13, 14, 15, 1)He, 2, 3, 1967]1SCR898, 1969]3SCR108, 1970]2SCR177, One, 148, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 18, 10, one, 20, 21, 31-3-78, one, one, two, two, 23, 110, 24, two, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 1, 902, 4, 1, 902, 1971]80ITR188(Guj, 1975CriLJ1545, 33, 34, 149(1, 1, 35, 22

TIME: Forty-second Amendment) Act, under this Act

GPE: States, India, New Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Kerala, Kanga, Kanga, Palkhivala, Kasturbhai, Lalbhai

PERSON: Lalji Haridas v. R. H. Bhatt, Lalji Haridas v. Income-tax Officer, App, Bangalore, Art, Art, Rajahmundry, H. W. R. Wade, Esher, Esher, Rampur Distillery, Lalji Haridas's, Lila D. Bhagat, Shri B. N. Kirpal, Shri G. C. Sharma, Shah J. in, Shri Sharma, Shri Sharma, Duty v. Mir Osman Ali, Vol, Bhargava v. Income-tax Officer, Salary Circle, Kasturbhai Lalbhai, Kundan Lal Behari Lal, O. Chinnappa Reddy J.

PERCENT: 1 Delhi

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, Firstly, first, second, second, first, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly

WORK_OF_ART: the Master Plan, 'Ripeness for Review' and 'Primary Jurisdiction', The Meaning Of S., Officers

NORP: American, R. K.

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Malhotra, Malhotra, the Full Bench of

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //