Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Manoj Didwania Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : Apr-10-1987

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Notification F. No, Section 127, section 127(1, Constitution, article 136 of the Constitution in, section 127(1

GPE: Jagdish, Chandra, India, New Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, New Delhi, Didwania, Bombay, Delhi, Didwania, Bombay

NORP: J.1, Central Circle

PERSON: Manoj Didwania, Shri K. Sundaresan, Madras, D. Y. Chandrachud, Madras, Nos, G. Anantaraman, K. Sunderesan, Madras

CARDINAL: 226, 227, 15/21-11-84, 2, 2, 3., 4., 5, 127, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, two, two, two, 8, 1976]102ITR281(SC, 285, 9, 10

ORG: Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Board, Board, Board, Board, Bombay Central-III, Bombay Central-III, Bombay Central-III, Finance, Government of India, Dindayal Didwania, ADI, Board, Dindayal Didwania, Board, Board, Ajantha Industries, Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Supreme Court, the High Court, inter alia, the Supreme Court

DATE: March 20, 1986, March 20, 1986, March 20, 1986, 1961, 1975, October 1, 1975, November 28, 1985, February 3, 1986, November 28, 1985

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Central Circle, Madras

ORDINAL: second

PRODUCT: Calcutta

FAC: Madras, Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //