Deen Dayal Goyal Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-c, and Others

Decided On : Dec-12-1985

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 269H(1, section 269G, section 269F(6, section 269F(6, section 269G(1, section 269F(6, section 249, section 264, section 144, Section 269G occurs, Chapter XX, section 269F, section 269F., section 269F, section 269F, section 269H, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, section 66(1, the Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, section 29, the Limitation Act, INDIAN LIMITATION ACT, section 4, the Indian Limitation Act, section 29, section 5, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 29, section 29, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 5, section 269G(1, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, Mys 13, section 269G(l, section 29, the Limitation Act, section 29(2, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 29(2, section 5, section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Indian Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, section 5, section 269.28, section 5, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, Chapter, section 269F, section 209F, section 269F, section 5, the Limitation Act, Chapter, section 269H(l, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 5, the Limitation Act, section 269-I(1, section 269F, section 269F, section 269H, section 269H, section 269F(6, section 269-I, section 269H, section 269F(6, section 269H, section 5, the Limitation Act

GPE: Ranganathan, Greater Kailash, New Delhi, Singh, Explanationn, Explanationn, sections.33, J.36, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Ashfaq, Indian, Ashfaq

CARDINAL: three, 4, 5, two, two, 49,000, 4, 5, 6, 35,000, two, two, 4, 5, 6, 4, 6, 2, 3, 7, 4, 5, 3, 4, 9, 10, six, 6, 8), transferee, transferee, 8), 8), 13, 269H., 1, 14, One, 8), 146, 154, 249, 253, 264, 269, 4, 1984]146ITR506(MP, 15, three, two, two, 29(1, 2, 3, 4, 24, 9 to 18, 22, 246, 249, 253, 249, 253, 264, 1, 269, 4, 5, 1966CriLJ1210, 1974]3SCR31, 1976CriLJ179, 1977]1SCR563, 1977]1SCR996, 1977]1SCR683, 1984]147ITR613(MP, 6, 280, 1959]36ITR527(Bom, 52, 254, 1969]74ITR7(SC, 1975]3SCR743, 1978]114ITR822(Ker, 1983]139ITR1013(Bom, 1983]142ITR211(Guj, 1984]146ITR506(MP, one, 4, 24, 1961.26, two, 27, 4, 24, one, 1974]3SCR31, 1975CriLJ1091, 1977]1SCR563, 1977]1SCR683, three, 29, 246, 249, 264, two, 269, 269H., 269, 6, 1, 1, 32, 1, fifteen, 1, 6, 6, 269, 269, 269

DATE: 1961, 1976, March 29, 1975, April 3, 1975, July 27, 1974, July 9, 1975, fifty-seven days, 1976, May 31, 1974, June 5, 1974, December 29, 1972, January 1, 1973, July 19, 1974, February 5, 1975, 1976, 1961, the previous year, the assessment year, the previous year, the previous year, a period of, 30 days, 60 days, a period of, one year, sixty days, thirty days, one month, four years, four years, six months, a period of, 45 days, 30 days, 45 days, forty-five days, thirty days, forty-five days, thirty days, sixty days, sixty days, sixty days, section 269G.15, 90 days, 269H, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, 60 days, 5, 1963, 1922, the period of, one month, 1922, 60 days, 1151, 1908, 1908, 1963, 1908, 1963s, 1908, 1922, 1961, 1963, 1963, 1963, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, 269H, 1976, 1976, 1963, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1963, 1961, 1963, 1963, 269H, ninety days, a period of, 45 days, 30 days, a period of, 45 days, 30 days, the period of, 45 days, 30 days, the last day, 1963, 1961, thirty days, section 269G., 45 days, 30 days, 45 days, 30 days, 269H, 269H

ORG: Tribunal, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, Act, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal for the appeals, Tribunal, Appellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Legislature, Legislature, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT v. Gupta & Sons P. Ltd., the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Department, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AIR, State, Hukumdev Narain Yadav, Mangu Ram v. Municipal Corporation, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Kerala State Electricity Board, Madanlal Dan & Sons, CIT, Nirmal Khosla v. Union of India, Department, AIR 1921, New Savan Sugar, Gur Refining Co. Ltd., CIT, Sales Tax, Cochin Co., CIT, Union of India, CIT v. Gupta & Sons P. Ltd., A. Gupta Trust Estate, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Hukumdev, Bhagwan Das v. Delhi Administration, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Sales Tax v. Madanlal Das & Sons, Government, Tribunal, the Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Central Government, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, Legislature, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Legislature, the Competent Authority, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Court, the Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Central Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the Central Government

PERSON: Shri Yash Pal Nayyar, Bhagwati Devi, Kanga Palkhivala, Law, A. B. Saharya, theSchedule, Schedule, Schedule, Saharya, Shri Saharya, Saharya, Saharya, Sri Saharya, Saharya, Adinaranappa v. Mallamma, Moti Lal Kanoria, Lalit Narain Mishra, Subhadramani Dhal v. Jagannath Patra, Mohd, T. P. Kunhaliumma, Raj Chopra, Shanno Devi, AIR1981Delhi18, Manoj Ahuja, Shri Dhir, Saharya, Mahesh Harilal Khaman, B. N. Narasimhan, Shri Wadhera, Sundur Singh, Lata Mangeshkar v. Union, Laxminarayan R. Rathi v. ITO, Parson Tools, Kedar Nath Jhunjhunwalla, Ghanshyamdas Gopaldas Mohta, Rambhai Manja Nayak v. Union, CWT .25, Lalit Narain, Mohd, D.K. Kapur

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Deen Dayal Goel

PRODUCT: ITSA Nos, Act.4

FAC: Punjabi Bagh

MONEY: 256(1, 256(1

ORDINAL: 7th, Firstly, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, second, first, Secondly, Thirdly

LOC: the Limitation Act.30