Gagan Kanojia and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Decided On : Nov-24-2006

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 8, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 8, the Evidence Act, Section 8, Section 8, the Evidence Act, Section 6 of the Evidence Act, Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 27, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Heena, Kamal Kishore, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Kamal Kishore, Magistrate, inter alia, Kamal Kishore, State, the Dhobi Maha Sabha, the High Court, PW-2, Kamal Kishore, the First Information Report, Heena, Abhishek, Abhishek, Heena, Abhishek, Kamal Kishore, Magistrate, Heena, Sought, U.P., Rajinder Kumar, Heena, Abhishek, Heena, Heena, Chacha, Abhishek, Heena, Sarita, Rakesh Kumar, Kamal Kishore, Kamal Kishore, Court, State, U.P., the High Court, CBI, Magistrate, George and Ors, Sub Inspector, Deep Public School, Ahata, the Finger Print Bureau, PHHH, Shri H.S. Grewal, Judicial Magistrate, PJJ, the High Court, Angeethi, Reliance, State of Himachal Pradesh, the High Court

NORP: J.1, Extra, Punjab

DATE: 302/34, six and eight years, 20 days, two years, 1872, about 10 years, the next day, two years

CARDINAL: 201/34, two, one, 2, one, 3., one, one, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2.5, 6, 1, 1, 8), two, one, 8, two, one, 08.06.2000, 26.06.2000, 105, 106, 4, 11, 1996CriLJ4002, 12, 08.06.2000, three, two, 12.06.2000, 1, about 5, 14, 15, 1, 13.06.2000, 16.06.2000, two, 2003CriLJ894, 18, 2003CriLJ4974, 1, 1998CriLJ2034, one, 19, 1, two, 21, 09.06.2000, 2.22, 1, two, 1, One, 1990CriLJ2289, one

PERSON: Abhishek, Appellants, Mahabir Singh, Sahil, Ex, D.P. Singh, Rajindra Kumar, Chandigarh, Kumar Kanojia, Balbir Singh, Sahil Kumar, Gagan, Gagan, Gagan, Ambala, Rakesh Kanojia, Gagan, Abhishek, Rakesh Kanojia, Ex, Nirmal Singh, Appellants, Gagan, Anr, Rajender Kumar Kanojia, Singh, Paramjit Singh, Abhishek, Cine Payal Cinema, Sahil, Sarita, Sarita, Sarita, Sarita, D.P. Singh, Sarita, Sarita, Sarita, Sahil, Gagan, Mahabir Singh, Gagan, Gagan, Kumar Kanojia, Gagan, Rajinder Kumar, Mahabir Singh, Gagan, Mahabir Singh, Arun Kumar Gupta, Singh @, Balwinder Singh v. State, Delhi v. Shri Ram Lohia, Anr, Baldev Singh, Nirmal Singh, Hardeep Singh, PW-16, Kamal Kishore, Shri Balwinder, Singh Bhandal, Nirmal Singh, ASI Mohinder Singh, Mahabir Singh, D.K. Garg

GPE: Pooja, Chachu, Gagan, Ex, Delhi, Pooja, Pooja, Pooja, Kerala, Kishore Chand

TIME: 6.30 p.m., 6.15 p.m., about 6.15 p.m., the same night

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1 herein, Appellant No., Appellant No. 1 under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No, Appellant No. 2, Appellant No. 2, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 1, Appellant No.

PRODUCT: PW-15, PW-15, P.W. 10, Appellant No, Appellant No, PW-17, PW-12, PW-21, Appellant No.1, Appellant No.1

FAC: PW-4, PW-4, PW-4

QUANTITY: 100 yards