Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ku. Rashmi Mishra Vs. Madhya Pradesh Public Service Comission and ors.

Decided On : Oct-19-2006

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 15-A of the Madhya Pradesh, Rule 11, Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 14, Rule 19, Constitution, Constitution

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Post, Public Service Commission, the State University of Madhya Pradesh, Commission, State, The State of Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh State University Service Rules, the State Government, Schedule I.(3, Commission, Government or University, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the High Court, inter alia, Ajay Hasia v., Ashok Kumar Yadav, Haryana and Ors, the Madhya Pradesh Service Commission, the Public Service Commission;iii, Reliance, Prabodh Verma and Ors, State of, Uttar Pradesh and Ors, The High Court, the Selection Committee, the High Court, the Selection Committee, the State of Uttar Pradesh, All India SC, ST Employees Assn, Ors, U.P., the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Indian Administrative Service, the Indian Foreign Service, the Indian Police Service, Court, State, U.P., Court, Judicial Officers, Commission, Commission, State of Jammu & Kashmir, Ors, AIR1991SC2248, Court, Patwaris, Ashok Kumar Yadav, the previous Service Selection Board, Committee, the Ashok Kumar Yadav, Court, Ors, Court, Rajeev Govil, Vivek Aggarwal, Board, the U.P. State Electricity Board, Assistant Engineers (Civil, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, State, Commission

NORP: J.1, Rules, Patwari, Rules, Rules

DATE: 7 years', 1973, 1982, 7 years, more than three years, 23.11.2003, 1982, 1982, interview.10, Articles 14, Articles 14, 15

ORDINAL: 1st, first, second

CARDINAL: about 24.7.2003, 17, 4., 2, 1, 7, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, more than one, 12, 1, 6158, 4767, 55, 17, 3 and 4, 3 and 4, 3, 4, 6, 1981)ILLJ103SC, 1985]1SCR216, 17, 3 and 4, 8., 3 and 4, 3 and 4, 9, 2001]2SCR1183, 150, 33 1/3, 250, 33 1/3, 11, 12, 2, 19, 2003)2SCC132, 13, 1991)IILLJ103SC, 25, 25, 5, 9, 2, 50, 79, more than 100, three, 16, 16, one, 15, one

PERSON: Registrar, Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, Appellant, S.D.M. Ujjain, Registrar, S.B. Sanyal, Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, AIR1987SC454, Appellant, S.K. Gambhir, Registrar, Nos, Nos, Sangh, Sangh, Anr, v. A. Arthur Jeen and Ors, Indu Shekhar Singh, Sanyal, Ajay Hasia, Peeriakaruppan, Nishi Maghu, Kumar Yadav, cooperative- ness, Ashok Kumar Yadav, Jaswinder Singh, Vijay Syal, Anr, K.H. Siraj, Sardara Singh, Rajiv Govil, Gyanendra Bahadur Srivastava, Registrar, purpose.16

GPE: Kuladhipati, Kuladhipati, Kuladhipati, Kuladhipati, AIR2003SC4023, Kerala, supplied)14, India, India

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Castes, Appellant

PRODUCT: Appellant, stated:.Now

FAC: Prabodh Verma, Munindra Kumar

TIME: a few minutes, more than 4 minutes

MONEY: 75 marks, 275 marks, 50 marks, 1800 marks, only 12.2 per cent, 134.5 marks, 87.5 marks, 85 marks, more than 81 marks, 10 per cent, 5 per cent marks, 40 marks, 40 marks, 10 per cent, 5 per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //