Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kailash Vs. State of M.P.

Decided On : Oct-09-2006

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 498-A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 498-A, Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act', Section 304-B., Section 304-B., Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

NORP: J.1, P-1, Kans

ORG: the Madhya Pradesh High Court, IPC, Court, IPC, IPC, PW7, Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, Learned Counsel, Court, the High Court, Court, Section 304B IPC, and(e, and(e, Section 114 Illustration, Suffice, Court, the High Court

GPE: Jabalpur, Delhi, Shanti v. State, Thakkan

CARDINAL: 304, 4.5.1997, 18.3.1999, one, 3, 6., 2000CriLJ2993, three, 217, 1991CriLJ1713, 13, 348.11

DATE: 1860, ten years, nearly eights years, 1872, 7 years, 7 years, 7 years, 7 years, eight years, eight years

PERSON: Shyam Bai, Shyam Bai, Uma Devi, Uma Devi, R.G. Kotia, Kotia, Uma Devi, Kotia, Mainda Bai, Desh Raj (PW5, Parwati, Mukundi, Counsel, Bench, Hira Lal v. State, Haryana

TIME: the wee hours, 12 to 24 hours

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //