Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Rangnath Haridas Vs. Dr. Shrikant B. Hegde
Decided On : Aug-22-2006
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Order XL Rule 1, Order 21 Rule 22, Section 37(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 37(1, Order 21 Rule 22, Order 21 Rule 22
PERSON: Dalveer Bhandari, Patil Marg, Dadar, Patil Marg, Shivaji Park, Patil Marg, P.D. Desai, Justice Tipnis, S.S. Nijjar, Chamber Summons, Rane, Rane, Rane, Chamber Summons, Prayer, Nos, Pay Order No, Dadar, Patil Marg, Shivaji Park, Taluka Haveli, District Pune, Patil Marg, P.D. Desai, Justice Tipnis, Taluka Haveli, Arvind Sawant, Patil Marg, Shivaji Park, Taluka Haveli, District Pune
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 17.08.2004, 388, 3., 672, 21.10.2004, 1991.6, about 750, about 935, 935, 31.10.1991, 925, 622, 13, 750, 935, 5000/-, 672, 9, 1, 707, about 750, about 925, 925, 31.10.1991, 7, 925, 25, 255, 2, about 324, 10,00,000/-, 37(1, 622, 10, 12, 10, 32, 25, 255, about 324, 9, 13, 2, 3, 4, 255, 324
DATE: 2003, 2003, 1990, 16.9.1985, 1990, 16.9.1985.5, 1.11.1991, 1908, 400028, 29th November, 1999, 2660, 1999, 1st November, 16.9.1985, 16.9.1985.5, 466770, 1964, eight weeks, 16th day of September, 1991, 1991, 16th September, 1991, seven days, 10th August, 1999, 2660, 1999, 2002, 30th July, 2001, 1st, November, 1991, 9th July, 1996, two weeks, today, four weeks, four weeks, today, 2004, 17th August, 2004, 21st October, 2004, 16.9.1985, 16.9.1985.4, 1964, eight weeks, four weeks, 16th of September 1991, 1991, 27.07.1995, 30.07.2001, 1985, four weeks, three weeks, four weeks, six weeks
ORG: Execution Application, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Division Bench, Suit, the High Court, Execution Application, the Court Receiver, High Court, the Court Receiver, High Court, the Court Receiver, Architect and Contractor, this Hon'ble Court, M/s Nandkarni & Co., Notice of Motion No, Occupation Certificate, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, the Wings of the, Floor of B-Wing, 2nd Floor, the Maharashtra Ownership Flat Act, Registrar of Assurances, 2nd Floor, Plaintiff, Lordships, Defendants, Defendants, Plaintiff, the Notice of Motion No, Notice of Motion, Notice of Motion No, Notices of Motion, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, M.O.U., Court, Court, Court, the Court Receiver, of.8, the Bombay High Court, CPC, Chamber, Chamber, Chamber, the Division Bench, Court, Chamber, Plaintiff, Plot No, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, the Municipal Corporation of Greater, Plaintiff, Canara Bank, Plaintiff, Maharashtra Ownership Flat Act, S. No., the Income Tax, Lordship, Clauses 9, Consent Terms, the High Court, Chamber, the Counter Affidavit, Village Loni, Counsel, CPC, the High Court, Court, 2nd Floor, the Court Receiver, Village Loni Lalbhor
GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Golden Height, Mumbai, Bombay, 01.11.1991, District Pune
LOC: Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Respondent, Single Judge, the District of Pune
WORK_OF_ART: the Chamber Summons, The Chamber Summons, The Chamber Summons
ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, second, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 16th, 2nd, third
PRODUCT: Appellant, B-Wing, B-Wing, B-Wing, Survey 25
EVENT: September 1985, Clauses 9 and 10