Nagar Mahapalika (Now Municipal Corpn.) Vs. State of U.P. and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-02-2006

Court: Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 6-N, Section 106, Section 107, Section 109, Section 107, Section 106, Section 112-A of the Adhiniyam, Section 577, Section 2(oo)(bb, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 6-N of the Act, the Apprentice Act, a Constitution Bench, Section 2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 6-N, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25F, the Industrial Disputes Act

ORG: S.B. Sinha, a Municipal Corporation, Respondents, the Administrator of the Municipality, The Government of Uttar Pradesh, Quinquennial Assessment, Administration, Respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Respondents, the Assessment Department, Respondents, Allahabad, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Labour Court, Allahabad, Shri Ram, the Labour Court, the Writ Petition, the State Government, the State Public Service Commission, the Selection Committee, the State Public Service Commission, the Selection Committee, the State Government, the State Government, Sections 106 to 110 the State Government, the State Government, Mahapalikas, the Municipal Board, the State Public Service Commission, the High Court, Respondents, the U.P. Municipal Corporation Adhiniyam, Respondents, the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act.9, The High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Court, Hindustan Tin Works Pvt, Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd., Ors, Appellant, Respondents, State, The Appointing Authority, Respondents, Respondents, the Assessment Department, Court, State, the High Courts, Court, Umadevi and Ors, GO, the High Court, petition.14, The High Court, the High Court, Appellant, the High Court, the High Court, Appellants, Respondents, the High Court, the High Court, The Labour Court, Court, the Labour Court, Respondents, The Municipal Corporation, Respondents, M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd., The Industrial Court, the High Court, Corporation, the Industrial Courts, the High Court, Respondents, S.M. Nilajkar and, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Court, the High Court, Appellants, Court, Executive Engineer, Respondents, the High Court

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1959, 31st March, 1986, 31st March, 1986, 230/- per month, 20th October, 1984, 19.12.1985, 5.11.1985, 26.8.1987, 30th November, 1998, more than 240 days, 31.12.1986, 1989, two months, today, the period of one year, more than a year, 1947, 1959, daily, 240 days, daily, 1961, daily, 2006)IILLJ722SC, the year 1989, 2004, more than 14 years, 16.9.1985 to 19.5.1987, 240 days

PERSON: Adhiniyam, Chandra Gupta, Chandra Gupta, Shri Mithai Lal, Jal Sansthan, Adhiniyam, Articles 14, Articles 14, Anr, Karnataka, Nilajkar, ZP Engg, Anr, Digambara Rao, Adhiniyam

PRODUCT: Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Rule 2 of the Standing Orders, Appellant

CARDINAL: 11.12.1985.3, 39, 19.12.1985, 11.12.1985.5, 31.12.1986, about 4.2.1987, 31.12.1986, 7279, half, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, one, 1, 1, 2, 19.12.1985, 16, 16, 2006)IILLJ215SC, 10,000/-, 2003)IILLJ359SC, two, four, one, four, 2005)ILLJ1SC, 30,000/-

GPE: Ld, India, Karnataka, Morena, Telecom

PERCENT: 50%

WORK_OF_ART: The Industrial Tribunals

LOC: Respondent, matter.15, Single

FAC: Regulation 16 of 1976