Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Vijay Kumar and ors. Vs. Whirlpool of India Ltd. and ors.
Decided On : Nov-22-2007
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 12(3, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33C(2, Section 3 of the Act, Section 2, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2, Section 2(s, Section 33-C(2, Section 10 of the Act, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 33-C(2, Section 10 of the Act
NORP: Punjab
ORG: Haryana High Court, the Letters Patent Appeal, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-I, the High Court, Learned Single, Tribunal, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Letters Patent Appeal, 30.6.1995, 30.6.1995, the High Court, Tribunal, The High Court, Learned Counsel, CoverageAll, Kelvinator of India Ltd., Court, A.K. Bindal v. Union of India, CEAT Ltd., VRS, Court, the Industrial Court, U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, State Bank of India v. Ram, Court, Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Labour Court, Labour Court, the Labour Court
LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge
CARDINAL: 2., 1, 125, 13.10.1995, 143, two, one, 13.10.1995, 3., 4, 5, one, 7, 6, 0.6, 1.10.1995.8, 9, 10, 2003)IILLJ1078SC, 5, 337, 2006)IIILLJ969SC, one, 8, 2000)IILLJ1660SC, one
DATE: 26.5.1995, 1947, 58 years, 30th June, 1995, frustrated.11, 1947, nearly two years, 1994
PERSON: Counsel, Counsel, Jeet Singh, Ballabgarh, Abasaheb Hawaldar, Counsel, Order, Birendra Bhandari, Chandra Dubey
GPE: Faridabad, Clause
ORDINAL: second, third
MONEY: 15 per cent
WORK_OF_ART: a Memorandum of Understanding