Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ramreddy Rajeshkhanna Reddy and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Decided On : Mar-24-2006
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 302, Section 34, the Indian Penal Code, Section 302 IPC, the Appellant No, the Appellant No. 1, the Appellant No. 1
ORG: S.B. Sinha, IPC, Durga Talkies, Dasli, P.W.4-A. Venkateswarlu, Kothagudem, Jeep, Telugu, Bankur Ravi, Agulla Venkateswarlu, Venkateswarlu, Durga Talkies, him.2, the First Information Report, FIR, Appellants, FIR, inter alia, M.A. Isas Assha, A2, The High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Cousel, Cousel, the First Information Report, Appellants, the High Court, FIR, Durga Talkies;(ii, Appellants, Cousel, State, Appellants, FIR, Lakshmi, Durga Talkies, Appellants, Nos.1, the First Information Report, Court, the First Information Report, FIR, FIR, Durga Talkies, FIR, FIR, Appellants, FIR, FIR, Appellants, FIR, Appellants, the First Information Report, First Information Report, the High Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Cousel, Court, The High Court, State, Post-Mortem Report, A.P., State, U.P., Court, State of Jammu & Kashmir, See State of M.P., CBI, Ors, Paltan Mallah
NORP: J.1, P.W.5, P.W.5, P.W.5, P.W.5, Punjab
CARDINAL: 1, one, 3, 2, one, 1, two, two, 1, 2, 1, two, 2, 3, one, one, four, half, one, three, four, 6, 235, Suverna'.8, 2, 9, 2, 10, 2, 3, 2, only one, two, 1, 1, 4, 2 to one, about 10.30, 2, 2, 1, One, 1, 14, 3, one, one, 9.00, 2, three, 18, 19, about 5-6, 2004)10SCC443, 2, 3, 5, 10, 2. 20, 2003)9SCC67, 2005CriLJ4131, 21, 2005CriLJ1428, 2002CriLJ4664, 2005CriLJ918, 2, 23
PERSON: Abdul Rahman, Mohammad Rafiq Khan, Gugloth Dasli, Anwar Khan, Appellant Nos, Mohamood Khan, J. Srinivas, Rafeek Khan, Rajesh Khanna, Rajesh Khanna, S.K. Abdul Rahman @ Nathi Babu, did'nt, Mohd, Khan, Rafeek Khan, Ramreddy Rajesh Khana, Bankur Ravi, Abdul Rahman @ Nathi Babu, Abdul Rahman, J. Srinivas, rigor mortis, P.W.9-Dronapalli Chiranjeevi, Annadanam Karyakram, Kothagudem, Annadana Karyakram, Coolie Line, Mohd, Rafiq Khan, Appellants, Anwar Khan, Rehmana Begum, P. Venkateshwarlu, R.P. Gupta, Appellants, Toxicology, Appellants, Bandaru Satvam Pendya Venkateshwarlu, Rafiq Khan, Appellants, Coolie, Suverna, Bala Krishana, Appellants, Bala Krishana, S.M. Surender Nath, S.I., Appellants, Abdul Rahman, Appellants, Abdul Rahman, P.W.4, Appellants, Appellants, P. Venkateshvarlu, rigor mortis, Garg, Ram Udgar Singh v. State of, rigor mortis, Daljit Singh, Anr, rigor mortis, Bodh Raj @ Bodha, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants
DATE: 14.6.1998, 15.6.1998, Yesterday, 14.6.1998, Today, 15.06.1998 early in the morning, 1.7.1998, between 1200 to 1500 hours.3, three days, 14.6.1998, two days, 14.6.1998, 14.6.1998, the next day, 16.6.1998, 27.9.2001, three years three months, 14.6.1998, that day, July 2, 1975, 2004, 5, two days
TIME: between 10.30 p.m., 14.6.1998 to 5.00 a.m., about 9 p.m., about 10.30 p.m., the same night, about 5.00 a.m., the next morning, the previous night, the morning, about 6.00 a.m., about 10.30 Night, that night, about 5.00 a.m., the night, the night, about 5.30 am one, previous night, 11.00 a.m., about 1.30 p.m., 12 to 15 hours, 10.30 p.m. to 1.30 p.m., night, 8 p.m., one hour, about 9 p.m., 9.30 p.m., about 8 a.m., 9 p.m., about 20 minutes, the night, 7.30 a.m., 10.30 p.m., about 5.50 a.m., 5.50 a.m., about 8.00 a.m., 6.00 a.m., 8.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m., 0645 hours, 0645 hours, about 5.30 a.m., about 10.55 a.m., about five hours, two hours, three to four hours
WORK_OF_ART: The Appellant No. 2, the Appellant No. 1, the Appellant No. 1, Appellant No. 2, Appellant No. 4, the Appellant No, the Appellant No, The Appellant No
GPE: Kothagudem, Ramreddi, Machaboina Ramesh, Venkateswarlu, Manchaboina, Modi, Kusapati Sreenivas, Modi, Pattipati, case.[See, Singh v. State of Bihar
ORDINAL: first, third, first, 14th, first, 0of
FAC: Seven Hills Hotal Area, A4, Kothagudem II
PRODUCT: A1, the Appellant Nos, Appellant No, Appellant No
EVENT: the Appellant No, the Appellant No, PW 2.[See
LOC: the Appellant No